Suppr超能文献

三种粒细胞采集动员方法的评估与比较

Evaluation and comparison of three mobilization methods for the collection of granulocytes.

作者信息

Jendiroba D B, Lichtiger B, Anaissie E, Reddy V, O'Brien S, Kantarjian H, Freireich E J

机构信息

Department of Leukemia, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1998 Aug;38(8):722-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38898375510.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer chemotherapeutic regimens have become more potent and myeloablative. As a consequence, morbidity and mortality due to opportunistic infections have become a major challenge. The provision of adequate doses of viable granulocytes has thus become an important approach for circumventing the problem. A schedule for collecting therapeutic numbers of cells with minimal donor toxicity has yet to be established.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

An investigation of three mobilization schedules for the collection of granulocytes for transfusion--granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms per kg daily; G-CSF 5 micrograms per kg every other day, and prednisone 60 mg given orally (20 mg doses at 17 hours, 12 hours, and 2 hours before the collection).

RESULTS

A total of 464 apheresis procedures involving 163 healthy donors were analyzed. Prednisone caused a small increase in the white cell (WBC) counts over the collection days, while G-CSF every other day and daily schedules improved WBC counts to 145 and 160 percent, respectively (p = 0.004). Similarly, administration of G-CSF daily and every other day mobilized higher yields of granulocytes over the collection days, compared to the prednisone schedule (170% and 180% vs. 105%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Compared with prednisone, higher WBC yields were achieved by G-CSF stimulation; G-CSF given every other day is as effective as daily G-CSF administration for the recruitment of granulocytes, which makes the mobilization procedure more cost-effective.

摘要

背景

癌症化疗方案的强度和骨髓清除作用日益增强。因此,机会性感染导致的发病率和死亡率已成为一项重大挑战。提供足够剂量的活性粒细胞已成为解决这一问题的重要方法。然而,尚未制定出一种既能采集到治疗所需数量的细胞又能使供体毒性最小的方案。

研究设计与方法

对三种用于采集粒细胞进行输血的动员方案进行了研究——每日每千克体重注射5微克粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF);隔日每千克体重注射5微克G-CSF,以及在采集前17小时、12小时和2小时口服60毫克泼尼松(每次20毫克)。

结果

共分析了涉及163名健康供体的464次单采程序。在采集日期间,泼尼松使白细胞(WBC)计数略有增加,而隔日和每日注射G-CSF方案分别使WBC计数提高到145%和160%(p = 0.004)。同样,与泼尼松方案相比,每日和隔日注射G-CSF在采集日期间动员的粒细胞产量更高(分别为170%和180%,而泼尼松方案为105%;p = 0.02)。

结论

与泼尼松相比,G-CSF刺激可获得更高的白细胞产量;隔日注射G-CSF在动员粒细胞方面与每日注射G-CSF同样有效,这使得动员程序更具成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验