Suppr超能文献

用于带环粘结的双固化玻璃离子水门汀与传统玻璃离子水门汀的对比实验室研究。

Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation.

作者信息

Millett D T, Kamahli K, McColl J

机构信息

Glasgow Dental School, UK.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 1998 Aug;68(4):345-50. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0345:CLIODC>2.3.CO;2.

Abstract

This laboratory study compared the mean tensile bond strength, mode of band failure, and survival time of orthodontic bands cemented with dual-cured cement or conventional glass ionomer cement. Survival time was assessed following application of mechanical stress in a ball mill. Mean tensile bond strength was significantly higher for bands cemented with the dual-cured cement (p < 0.01), and mean survival time was significantly greater. Bands cemented with glass ionomer failed mainly at the cement/band interface. The results suggest that dual-cured cement is superior to glass ionomer for band cementation.

摘要

这项实验室研究比较了用双固化水门汀或传统玻璃离子水门汀粘结的正畸带环的平均拉伸粘结强度、带环断裂模式和存活时间。在球磨机中施加机械应力后评估存活时间。用双固化水门汀粘结的带环的平均拉伸粘结强度显著更高(p < 0.01),平均存活时间也显著更长。用玻璃离子水门汀粘结的带环主要在水门汀/带环界面处断裂。结果表明,在带环粘结方面,双固化水门汀优于玻璃离子水门汀。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验