Suppr超能文献

用于带环粘结的双固化玻璃离子水门汀与传统玻璃离子水门汀的对比实验室研究。

Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation.

作者信息

Millett D T, Kamahli K, McColl J

机构信息

Glasgow Dental School, UK.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 1998 Aug;68(4):345-50. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0345:CLIODC>2.3.CO;2.

Abstract

This laboratory study compared the mean tensile bond strength, mode of band failure, and survival time of orthodontic bands cemented with dual-cured cement or conventional glass ionomer cement. Survival time was assessed following application of mechanical stress in a ball mill. Mean tensile bond strength was significantly higher for bands cemented with the dual-cured cement (p < 0.01), and mean survival time was significantly greater. Bands cemented with glass ionomer failed mainly at the cement/band interface. The results suggest that dual-cured cement is superior to glass ionomer for band cementation.

摘要

这项实验室研究比较了用双固化水门汀或传统玻璃离子水门汀粘结的正畸带环的平均拉伸粘结强度、带环断裂模式和存活时间。在球磨机中施加机械应力后评估存活时间。用双固化水门汀粘结的带环的平均拉伸粘结强度显著更高(p < 0.01),平均存活时间也显著更长。用玻璃离子水门汀粘结的带环主要在水门汀/带环界面处断裂。结果表明,在带环粘结方面,双固化水门汀优于玻璃离子水门汀。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验