• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跟腱断裂的手术修复。手术治疗与保守治疗的比较。

Surgical repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Comparison of surgical with conservative treatment.

作者信息

Winter E, Weise K, Weller S, Ambacher T

机构信息

Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(6-7):364-7. doi: 10.1007/s004020050267.

DOI:10.1007/s004020050267
PMID:9709852
Abstract

Achilles tendon suture combined with a triceps surae tendon tip-over graft was performed in 314 patients with acute rupture of the Achilles tendon between 1980 and 1991. Analysis of these cases showed a low tissue complication rate compared with that reported in the literature. An average of 8.1 years after repair, 223 patients were examined using Holz's scale of clinical assessment after Achilles tendon repair. The results were 'good' in 87.4%, 'fair' in 11.2% and 'poor' in 1.4%. The re-rupture rate was very low (0.4%). These results are better than the re-rupture rate after surgical repair with solely end-to-end suture or after conservative immobilizing or conservative functional treatment. In conclusion, these data show that the fascial reinforcement is a valuable complement to the tendon suture.

摘要

1980年至1991年间,对314例急性跟腱断裂患者实施了跟腱缝合联合小腿三头肌腱翻转移植术。对这些病例的分析表明,与文献报道相比,组织并发症发生率较低。修复后平均8.1年,采用霍尔兹跟腱修复后临床评估量表对223例患者进行了检查。结果为“优”的占87.4%,“良”的占11.2%,“差”的占1.4%。再断裂率很低(0.4%)。这些结果优于单纯端端缝合手术修复后或保守固定或保守功能治疗后的再断裂率。总之,这些数据表明筋膜增强是肌腱缝合的一种有价值的补充。

相似文献

1
Surgical repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Comparison of surgical with conservative treatment.跟腱断裂的手术修复。手术治疗与保守治疗的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(6-7):364-7. doi: 10.1007/s004020050267.
2
Is open acute Achilles tendon rupture repair still justified? A single center experience and critical appraisal of the literature.开放性急性跟腱断裂修复术是否仍具合理性?单中心经验及文献批判性评估
Injury. 2018 Oct;49(10):1947-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
3
Augmented compared with nonaugmented surgical repair of a fresh total Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study.新鲜跟腱完全断裂手术修复中增强修复与非增强修复的比较。一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91(5):1092-100. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01089.
4
[Surgical therapy of Achilles tendon rupture].[跟腱断裂的手术治疗]
Unfallchirurg. 1995 Sep;98(9):468-73.
5
[Percutaneous tenorrhaphy for Achilles tendon rupture. Study of 29 cases].[经皮跟腱缝合术治疗跟腱断裂。29例研究]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999 Jun;85(3):277-85.
6
[A comparative study on repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture using three operating techniques].[三种手术技术修复急性跟腱断裂的比较研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jul;26(7):814-8.
7
Surgical Treatment Versus Conservative Management for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.急性跟腱断裂的手术治疗与保守治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Nov-Dec;56(6):1236-1243. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.036.
8
Long-Term Results of Mini-Open Repair Technique in the Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Prospective Study.小切口开放修复技术治疗急性跟腱断裂的长期疗效:一项前瞻性研究
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;55(5):971-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
The improved oval forceps suture-guiding method for minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair.用于微创跟腱修复的改良椭圆形钳引导缝合方法
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1228-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 2.
10
A new less invasive surgical technique in the management of acute Achilles tendon rupture through limited-open procedure combined with a single-anchor and "circuit" suture technique.一种通过有限切开手术联合单锚钉和“环线”缝合技术治疗急性跟腱断裂的新的微创外科技术。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Aug 10;13(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0895-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Full thickness open tear of the tendoachilles - Functional outcomes following a stable, single stage repair.跟腱全层开放性撕裂——稳定的一期修复后的功能结果
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul 14;14:132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.033. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
No midterm advantages in the middle term using small intestinal submucosa and human amniotic membrane in Achilles tendon transverse tenotomy.在跟腱横断术中使用小肠黏膜下层和人羊膜在中期没有中期优势。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Nov 24;11(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0463-1.
3
Outcomes of acute Achilles tendon rupture repair with bone marrow aspirate concentrate augmentation.
骨髓抽吸浓缩液增强修复急性跟腱断裂的疗效
Int Orthop. 2015 May;39(5):901-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2725-7. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
4
Augmentation vs Nonaugmentation Techniques for Open Repairs of Achilles Tendon Ruptures with Early Functional Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Study.增强与非增强技术在早期功能治疗下开放修复跟腱断裂的前瞻性随机研究。
J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Dec 15;5(4):607-14. eCollection 2006.
5
Clinical and biomechanical outcome of minimal invasive and open repair of the Achilles tendon.跟腱微创修复与开放修复的临床及生物力学结果
Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011 Dec 20;3(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-3-32.
6
Tendon repair augmented with a novel circulating stem cell population.采用新型循环干细胞群体增强肌腱修复。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2011;4(3):214-9. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
7
Minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures with Achillon device.使用Achillon装置对急性跟腱断裂进行微创修复。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2012 Jun;96(1):35-9. doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0158-z. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
8
Is percutaneous repair better than open repair in acute Achilles tendon rupture?经皮修复与开放性修复在急性跟腱断裂中的疗效比较
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):998-1003. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1830-1.
9
Biomechanical properties of Achilles tendon repair augmented with a bioadhesive-coated scaffold.生物黏附涂层支架增强修复后的跟腱的生物力学特性。
Biomed Mater. 2011 Feb;6(1):015014. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/6/1/015014. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
10
Anatomy of the sural nerve in a computer-assisted model: implications for surgical minimal-invasive Achilles tendon repair.计算机辅助模型中腓肠神经的解剖结构:对手术微创修复跟腱的意义。
Br J Sports Med. 2007 Jul;41(7):456-8; discussion 458. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.031328. Epub 2007 Mar 8.