Bertolini G, Ripamonti D, Cattaneo A, Apolone G
Laboratorio di Epidemiologia dell'Assistenza Sanitaria, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1427-32. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00031.
To assess the validity of the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) scoring system in accurately predicting the probability of mortality in an Italian intensive care unit (ICU) sample.
Prospective, observational, multicenter study.
Twenty-six Italian ICUs classified into two groups: a) ICUs specifically dedicated to treating pediatric patients; and b) adult ICUs treating children on a regular basis.
Consecutive patients (n = 1,533) <15 yrs of age admitted during 1 yr.
None.
To assess the performance of the PRISM scoring system, the discrimination and calibration measures were adopted both in the whole population and in 12 preselected subgroups. A good discrimination capability of the scoring system was observed for both the whole population and subgroups (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were never <0.82). On the other hand, we documented an unsatisfactory calibration capability in the whole population and in most subgroups (p values of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were <.001 in all but two subgroups).
The analyses suggest that the unsatisfactory calibration of PRISM can be attributed to various reasons. Among those reasons, a poor performance of the system, as well as its sensitivity to factors not connected to clinical ICU performance, seem particularly important. A special caution is needed in adopting a severity of illness scoring system to assess quality of care, particularly in contexts different from the one in which the instrument was originally developed.
评估儿童死亡风险(PRISM)评分系统在准确预测意大利重症监护病房(ICU)样本中死亡概率方面的有效性。
前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究。
26个意大利ICU分为两组:a)专门治疗儿科患者的ICU;b)定期治疗儿童的成人ICU。
1年内收治的年龄<15岁的连续患者(n = 1533)。
无。
为评估PRISM评分系统的性能,在总体人群和12个预先选定的亚组中均采用了区分度和校准度测量方法。在总体人群和亚组中均观察到该评分系统具有良好的区分能力(受试者工作特征曲线下面积均不低于0.82)。另一方面,我们发现总体人群和大多数亚组的校准能力不令人满意(除两个亚组外,所有亚组的Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验p值均<0.001)。
分析表明,PRISM校准不令人满意可归因于多种原因。在这些原因中,该系统表现不佳以及对与ICU临床表现无关的因素敏感似乎尤为重要。在采用疾病严重程度评分系统评估医疗质量时需要特别谨慎,尤其是在与该工具最初开发背景不同的情况下。