Suppr超能文献

动态血压对日常工作负荷反应的差异——工作控制的调节作用。

Variation in the ambulatory blood pressure response to daily work load--the moderating role of job control.

作者信息

Melamed S, Kristal-Boneh E, Harari G, Froom P, Ribak J

机构信息

Occupational Health and Rehabilitation Institute, Raanana, Israel.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Jun;24(3):190-6. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.298.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This quasi-experimental study tested the ambulatory blood pressure responsivity to daily variation in the work load of the same workers and examined whether this responsivity is moderated by perceived job control.

METHODS

The subjects were 79 nonshift, normotensive men who reported nearly almost equal occurrences of low and high work load in a typical workday. Job control was assessed by questionnaire. The workers recorded their situational work load and other parameters at each recording of ambulatory blood pressure.

RESULTS

An analysis of covariance showed the main effects of both situational work load and job control on systolic ambulatory blood pressure, as well as a significant work load by job control interaction, even after control for clinic blood pressure, age, and body mass index. A blood pressure response to increased work load was observed only for workers with low job control. These workers also had a higher average systolic ambulatory blood pressure than workers reporting high control. The difference was 6.2 mm Hg (0.82 kPa) during the low workload periods and 10.2 mm Hg (1.36 kPa) during the high workload periods. A further multiple regression analysis confirmed the interaction and the main effect of job control but not that of work load, after control for work-related activities, body position, and hour of examination.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that ambulatory blood pressure at work can fluctuate with variations in work load but only for workers with low job control. Low job control is independently associated with higher systolic ambulatory blood pressure.

摘要

目的

本 quasi 实验研究测试了同一批工人日常工作量变化时动态血压的反应性,并检验这种反应性是否受感知到的工作控制的调节。

方法

研究对象为 79 名非轮班、血压正常的男性,他们报告在典型工作日中低工作量和高工作量出现的频率几乎相等。通过问卷调查评估工作控制。工人在每次记录动态血压时记录其情境工作量和其他参数。

结果

协方差分析显示,即使在控制了诊所血压、年龄和体重指数之后,情境工作量和工作控制对动态收缩压均有主要影响,以及工作量与工作控制之间存在显著的交互作用。仅在工作控制低的工人中观察到对工作量增加的血压反应。这些工人的平均动态收缩压也高于报告工作控制高的工人。在低工作量期间差异为 6.2 毫米汞柱(0.82 千帕),在高工作量期间差异为 10.2 毫米汞柱(1.36 千帕)。进一步的多元回归分析在控制了与工作相关的活动、身体姿势和检查时间后,证实了交互作用和工作控制的主要影响,但未证实工作量的主要影响。

结论

本研究表明,工作时的动态血压会随工作量变化而波动,但仅适用于工作控制低的工人。低工作控制与较高的动态收缩压独立相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验