Delazer M, Denes G
Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Innsbruck, Austria.
Brain Lang. 1998 Sep;64(2):257-66. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1971.
We report on the writing of Arabic numerals in a patient whose alphabetical script was restricted to graphemic jargon (Schonauer & Denes, 1994). The analysis of writing errors in Arabic script over three testing sessions (4, 10, and 13 months after stroke) confirmed the separate processing of syntactic and lexical information in number production proposed by current models. The changing error pattern over time reflected some difficulties observed in developmental studies on the acquisition of Arabic numeral writing. Errors were mostly of the syntactic type and (at a certain stage) were based on the verbal form of the numerals. As reported in neuropsychological (Noel & Seron, 1995) and developmental (Power & Dal Martello, 1990; Seron & Fayol, 1994) studies, sum relations were more difficult to transcode than product relations within complex numerals.
我们报告了一位字母书写仅限于字素行话的患者书写阿拉伯数字的情况(Schonauer和Denes,1994年)。对三次测试 session(中风后4个月、10个月和13个月)中阿拉伯文字书写错误的分析证实了当前模型所提出的数字生成中句法和词汇信息的独立处理。随着时间推移而变化的错误模式反映了在阿拉伯数字书写习得的发展研究中观察到的一些困难。错误大多属于句法类型,并且(在某个阶段)基于数字的语言形式。正如神经心理学研究(Noel和Seron,1995年)以及发展研究(Power和Dal Martello,1990年;Seron和Fayol,1994年)中所报道的那样,在复杂数字中,求和关系比求积关系更难转码。