• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

句法结构和命题数量对局部脑血流模式的影响。

Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow.

作者信息

Caplan D, Alpert N, Waters G

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Neuropsychology Laboratory, Boston MA, 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jul;10(4):541-52. doi: 10.1162/089892998562843.

DOI:10.1162/089892998562843
PMID:9712683
Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to determine regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as a function of the syntactic form and propositional density of sentences. rCBF increased in the left pars opercularis, part of Broca's area, when subjects processed syntactically more complex sentences. There were no differences in rCBF in the perisylvian association cortex traditionally associated with language processing when subjects made plausibility judgments about sentences with two propositions as compared to sentences with one proposition, but rCBF increased in infero-posterior brain regions. These results suggest that there is a specialization of neural tissue in Broca's area for constructing aspects of the syntactic form of sentences to determine sentence meaning. They also suggest that this specialization is separate from the brain systems that are involved in utilizing the meaning of a sentence that has been understood to accomplish a task.

摘要

正电子发射断层扫描(PET)被用于确定局部脑血流量(rCBF)与句子的句法形式和命题密度之间的函数关系。当受试者处理句法上更复杂的句子时,左侧岛盖部(布罗卡区的一部分)的rCBF增加。当受试者对含有两个命题的句子与含有一个命题的句子进行合理性判断时,传统上与语言处理相关的颞叶周围联合皮层的rCBF没有差异,但脑后部区域的rCBF增加。这些结果表明,布罗卡区的神经组织专门用于构建句子的句法形式以确定句子含义。它们还表明,这种专门化与参与利用已理解的句子含义来完成任务的脑系统是分开的。

相似文献

1
Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow.句法结构和命题数量对局部脑血流模式的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jul;10(4):541-52. doi: 10.1162/089892998562843.
2
Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography.通过正电子发射断层扫描对句法理解进行定位。
Brain Lang. 1996 Mar;52(3):452-73. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0024.
3
PET studies of syntactic processing with auditory sentence presentation.使用听觉句子呈现进行句法加工的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究。
Neuroimage. 1999 Mar;9(3):343-51. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0412.
4
Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation.在同时发声的条件下,句法加工对布洛卡区的激活作用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2000 Feb;9(2):65-71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(200002)9:2<65::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-4.
5
Individual differences in rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension: effects of working memory and speed of processing.句子理解中句法加工的rCBF相关性的个体差异:工作记忆和加工速度的影响。
Neuroimage. 2003 May;19(1):101-12. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00007-7.
6
Effects of age and speed of processing on rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Jun;19(2):112-31. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10107.
7
Activation of language cortex with automatic speech tasks.通过自动言语任务激活语言皮层。
Neurology. 2000 Oct 24;55(8):1151-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.8.1151.
8
Neural correlates of syntactic transformations.句法转换的神经关联
Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 May;22(1):72-81. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20021.
9
Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca's area.句法和语义加工对布洛卡区各亚区的不同影响。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):297-307. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00285-9.
10
Activations of "motor" and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension.句子理解过程中“运动”及其他非语言结构的激活。
Brain Lang. 2004 May;89(2):290-9. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00359-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Networks for Semantic and Syntactic Prediction and Visual-Motor Statistical Learning in Adult Readers With and Without Dyslexia.用于有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍成年读者语义和句法预测以及视觉运动统计学习的神经网络
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Jul 22;6. doi: 10.1162/nol.a.8. eCollection 2025.
2
Sensitivity of the inferior frontal gyrus to morphological processing through the detection of category violation.通过检测类别违反来研究额下回对形态加工的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09921-z.
3
Distinct neural correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic comprehension processes in aphasia.
失语症中形态句法和主题理解过程的不同神经关联。
Brain Commun. 2025 Mar 24;7(2):fcaf093. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093. eCollection 2025.
4
Engagement of the speech motor system in challenging speech perception: Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses.参与具有挑战性的言语感知的言语运动系统:激活似然估计元分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Sep;45(13):e70023. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70023.
5
The Neurofunctional Correlates of Morphosyntactic and Thematic Impairments in Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.失语症中形态句法和主题障碍的神经功能关联:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Aug 31. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09648-0.
6
Syntactic structures in motion: investigating word order variations in verb-final (Korean) and verb-initial (Tongan) languages.动态中的句法结构:探究动词后置(韩语)和动词前置(汤加语)语言中的词序变化。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1360191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360191. eCollection 2024.
7
The interplay of semantic and syntactic processing across hemispheres.跨半球的语义和句法处理之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 4;14(1):5262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51793-2.
8
Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax, and Context.信息受限神经语言模型揭示了不同脑区对语义、句法和语境的敏感性。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Dec 14;4(4):611-636. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00125. eCollection 2023.
9
Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Dynamic Updating of Native Language.母语动态更新背后的神经机制。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Nov 1;1(4):492-522. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00023. eCollection 2020.
10
Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants.人类大脑中的跨模态句子处理:超过200名参与者的功能磁共振成像证据表明句法复杂性的影响
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Sep 29;3(4):575-598. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00076. eCollection 2022.