• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症中形态句法和主题理解过程的不同神经关联。

Distinct neural correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic comprehension processes in aphasia.

作者信息

Beber Sabrina, Capasso Rita, Maffei Chiara, Tettamanti Marco, Miceli Gabriele

机构信息

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto 38068, Italy.

Brain Associates, Roma 00195, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Commun. 2025 Mar 24;7(2):fcaf093. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093
PMID:40129862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11930358/
Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies in neurotypical subjects correlate sentence comprehension to a left fronto-temporo-parietal network. Recent voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) studies of aphasia confirm the link between sentence comprehension and a left posterior region including the angular gyrus, the supra-marginal gyrus and the postero-superior division of the temporal lobe but support left pre-frontal involvement inconsistently. However, these studies focus on thematic role assignment without considering morphosyntactic processes. Hence, available VLSM evidence could provide a partial view of the neurofunctional substrate of sentence comprehension. In the present VLSM study, both morphosyntactic and thematic processes were evaluated systematically and in the same sentence types in each participant, to provide a more detailed picture of the sentence comprehension network. Participants (33 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 90 healthy controls) completed a sentence-picture matching task in which active and passive, declarative reversible sentences were paired with morphosyntactic, thematic and lexical-semantic alternatives. Phonological short-term memory tasks were also administered. Aphasic participants were selected from an initial pool of 70 because they scored below norm on thematic foils ( = 18) or on thematic and morphological foils ( = 15), but within the norm on lexical-semantic foils. The neurofunctional correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic processes were starkly distinguishable. Pre-frontal areas including the inferior and middle frontal gyrus were involved directly in processing local morphosyntactic features and only indirectly in thematic processes. When these areas were damaged, morphosyntactic errors always co-occurred with thematic errors, probably because morphosyntactic damage disrupts the assignment of grammatical roles and ultimately that of thematic roles. Morphosyntactic errors were not influenced by word order canonicity. In contrast, selective thematic role reversals were linked to temporal and parietal damage and were significantly influenced by word order, occurring on passive more than on active sentences. An area including the angular and supra-marginal gyrus was critical for processing non-canonical word order. In sentence comprehension, pre-frontal regions are critical for processing local morphosyntactic features (at least in simple declarative sentences). Temporal and parietal regions are critical for thematic processes. Postero-superior temporal areas are involved in retrieving verb argument structure. Parietal areas are critical for assigning morphosyntactically analysed constituents to the appropriate thematic role, thus serving a crucial function in thematic re-analysis. Each area plays a prevailing but not exclusive role in these processes, interacting with other areas in the network and possibly providing both the language-specific and the domain-general resources needed at various stages of sentence comprehension.

摘要

针对神经典型受试者的功能性神经影像学研究,将句子理解与左侧额颞顶叶网络联系起来。近期关于失语症的基于体素的损伤-症状映射(VLSM)研究证实了句子理解与左侧后部区域之间的联系,该区域包括角回、缘上回以及颞叶后上部分,但对左侧前额叶的参与情况支持不一。然而,这些研究聚焦于题元角色分配,未考虑形态句法过程。因此,现有的VLSM证据可能仅提供了句子理解神经功能基质的部分观点。在本VLSM研究中,对每个参与者在相同句子类型中系统地评估了形态句法和题元过程,以更详细地描绘句子理解网络。参与者(33名中风后失语症患者和90名健康对照)完成了一项句子-图片匹配任务,其中主动和被动的陈述性可逆句子与形态句法、题元及词汇语义选项配对。还进行了语音短期记忆任务。失语症参与者从最初的70人中选出,因为他们在题元干扰项(n = 18)或题元与形态干扰项(n = 15)上得分低于正常水平,但在词汇语义干扰项上得分在正常范围内。形态句法和题元过程的神经功能相关性明显不同。包括额下回和额中回在内的前额叶区域直接参与处理局部形态句法特征,仅间接参与题元过程。当这些区域受损时,形态句法错误总是与题元错误同时出现,可能是因为形态句法损伤破坏了语法角色的分配,最终也破坏了题元角色的分配。形态句法错误不受词序规范性的影响。相比之下,选择性的题元角色反转与颞叶和顶叶损伤有关,并且受词序的显著影响,在被动句中比在主动句中更常出现。包括角回和缘上回的一个区域对于处理非规范词序至关重要。在句子理解中,前额叶区域对于处理局部形态句法特征至关重要(至少在简单陈述句中如此)。颞叶和顶叶区域对于题元过程至关重要。颞叶后上区域参与检索动词论元结构。顶叶区域对于将经过形态句法分析的成分分配到适当的题元角色至关重要,因此在题元重新分析中发挥关键作用。每个区域在这些过程中都发挥着主导但非排他性的作用,与网络中的其他区域相互作用,并可能在句子理解的各个阶段提供特定于语言和通用领域所需的资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/1bc8e3fa40e7/fcaf093f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/64a6c3cdb2ac/fcaf093_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/3e99ffb68724/fcaf093f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/9ae49aad6296/fcaf093f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/068d9de9b634/fcaf093f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/dcfd70dae8b8/fcaf093f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/1bc8e3fa40e7/fcaf093f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/64a6c3cdb2ac/fcaf093_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/3e99ffb68724/fcaf093f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/9ae49aad6296/fcaf093f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/068d9de9b634/fcaf093f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/dcfd70dae8b8/fcaf093f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f1/11930358/1bc8e3fa40e7/fcaf093f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Distinct neural correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic comprehension processes in aphasia.失语症中形态句法和主题理解过程的不同神经关联。
Brain Commun. 2025 Mar 24;7(2):fcaf093. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093. eCollection 2025.
2
Common and distinct neural substrates of sentence production and comprehension.句子产生和理解的共同和独特的神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117374. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117374. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
The Neurofunctional Correlates of Morphosyntactic and Thematic Impairments in Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.失语症中形态句法和主题障碍的神经功能关联:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Aug 31. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09648-0.
4
Canonical Sentence Processing and the Inferior Frontal Cortex: Is There a Connection?规范句处理与额下回:存在关联吗?
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Apr 13;3(2):318-344. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00067. eCollection 2022.
5
Mapping sentence comprehension and syntactic complexity: evidence from 131 stroke survivors.映射句子理解与句法复杂性:来自131名中风幸存者的证据。
Brain Commun. 2024 Nov 15;6(6):fcae379. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae379. eCollection 2024.
6
The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.左颞顶叶和额下回皮质在理解句法复杂句子中的作用:一项脑刺激研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108465. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
The Wernicke conundrum revisited: evidence from connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping.重新审视韦尼克难题:基于连接组学的病变-症状映射证据。
Brain. 2022 Nov 21;145(11):3916-3930. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac219.
8
Neural correlates of semantic-driven syntactic parsing in sentence comprehension.句子理解中语义驱动句法分析的神经关联
Neuroimage. 2024 Apr 1;289:120543. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120543. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
9
The neural basis of reversible sentence comprehension: evidence from voxel-based lesion symptom mapping in aphasia.可逆句理解的神经基础:来自失语症基于体素的病变症状映射的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):212-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00118. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
10
The Neurobiology of Agrammatic Sentence Comprehension: A Lesion Study.《语法错误句子理解的神经生物学:病变研究》。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):234-255. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01200. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The Neurofunctional Correlates of Morphosyntactic and Thematic Impairments in Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.失语症中形态句法和主题障碍的神经功能关联:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Aug 31. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09648-0.
2
Discriminating nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic PPA variants with automatically extracted morphosyntactic measures from connected speech.从连续语音中自动提取形态句法测量值,区分非流利/语法障碍型和失语法型进行性失语症变异。
Cortex. 2024 Apr;173:34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.013. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Was Broca wrong?
布罗卡错了吗?
Brain. 2024 Feb 1;147(2):325-326. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae003.
4
Causal evidence for a coordinated temporal interplay within the language network.语言网络中协调时间相互作用的因果证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 21;120(47):e2306279120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2306279120. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
5
Neural basis of speech and grammar symptoms in non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia spectrum.非流利型原发性进行性失语症谱系中言语和语法症状的神经基础。
Brain. 2024 Feb 1;147(2):607-626. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad327.
6
Thematic Reanalysis in the Left Posterior Parietal Sulcus: A TMS Study.左后顶叶沟的主题再分析:一项经颅磁刺激研究
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Aug 20;2(3):416-432. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00043. eCollection 2021.
7
The Wernicke conundrum revisited: evidence from connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping.重新审视韦尼克难题:基于连接组学的病变-症状映射证据。
Brain. 2022 Nov 21;145(11):3916-3930. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac219.
8
Functional differentiation in the language network revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.基于病变-症状映射的语言网络功能分化。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 15;247:118778. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118778. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Common and distinct neural substrates of sentence production and comprehension.句子产生和理解的共同和独特的神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117374. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117374. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
10
The role of the l-IPS in the comprehension of reversible and irreversible sentences: an rTMS study.左额下回在理解可逆句和不可逆句中的作用:一项 rTMS 研究。
Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Nov;225(8):2403-2414. doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02130-6. Epub 2020 Aug 25.