Hewitt S
Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire, UK.
Ann Occup Hyg. 1998 May;42(4):245-52. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00030-1.
Special gloves (commonly referred to as anti-vibration gloves) have been offered for many years as personal protection against hand-arm vibration generated, for example, by powered hand tools. An internationally agreed means of quantifying the vibration-reducing performance of such gloves was not available until the publication of International Standard ISO 10819, 1996. The evaluation of the Standard reported here has led to the conclusion that the test could be improved to give more information to the potential glove user about how the glove might perform. Investigations of the main factors which can influence the results of glove transmissibility tests have formed the basis for a proposal to develop the Standard. The proposed alternative test measures the performance of a glove in octave bands and the resultant data can be used to estimate the potential that the glove has to protect against any given vibration source. Examples of the application of the proposed alternative test for selection of anti-vibration gloves matched to particular vibration sources (powered hand tools) are given. The advantages and disadvantages of the two test methods are discussed. The evaluation of the Standard and proposals for its development are under discussion with members of the committee which developed ISO 10819, 1996.
多年来,一直提供特殊手套(通常称为防振手套)作为个人防护装备,以抵御例如电动手动工具产生的手臂振动。直到1996年国际标准ISO 10819发布,才有了一种国际认可的量化此类手套减振性能的方法。本文所报告的对该标准的评估得出的结论是,可以改进测试,以便为潜在的手套使用者提供更多关于手套性能的信息。对可能影响手套传递性测试结果的主要因素进行的调查,构成了一项修订该标准提案的基础。拟议的替代测试在倍频程频段测量手套的性能,所得数据可用于估计手套抵御任何给定振动源的潜力。给出了拟议的替代测试在选择与特定振动源(电动手动工具)相匹配的防振手套方面的应用示例。讨论了两种测试方法的优缺点。目前正在与制定1996年ISO 10819标准的委员会成员讨论对该标准的评估及其修订提案。