Griffin M J
Human Factors Research Unit, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, UK.
Occup Environ Med. 1998 May;55(5):340-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.5.340.
A method of evaluating the effectiveness of gloves in reducing the hazards of hand-transmitted vibration is proposed.
The glove isolation effectiveness was calculated from: (a) the measured transmissibility of a glove, (b) the vibration spectrum on the handle of a specific tool (or class of tools), and (c) the frequency weighting indicating the degree to which different frequencies of vibration cause injury. With previously reported tool vibration spectra and glove transmissibilities (from 10-1000 Hz), the method was used to test 10 gloves with 20 different powered tools.
The frequency weighting for hand-transmitted vibration advocated in British standard 6842 (1987) and international standard 5349 (1986) greatly influences the apparent isolation effectiveness of gloves. With the frequency weighting, the gloves had little effect on the transmission of vibration to the hand from most of the tools. Only for two or three tools (those dominated by high frequency vibration) did any glove provide useful attenuation. Without the frequency weighting, some gloves showed useful attenuation of the vibration on most powered tools.
In view of the uncertain effect of the vibration frequency in the causation of disorders from hand-transmitted vibration, it is provisionally suggested that the wearing of a glove by the user of a particular vibratory tool could be encouraged if the glove reduces the transmission of vibration when it is evaluated without the frequency weighting and does not increase the vibration when it is evaluated with the frequency weighting. A current international standard for the measurement and evaluation of the vibration transmitted by gloves can classify a glove as an antivibration glove when it provides no useful attenuation of vibration, whereas a glove providing useful attenuation of vibration on a specific tool can fail the test.
提出一种评估手套在减少手部传递振动危害方面有效性的方法。
手套隔离有效性通过以下方式计算:(a) 测量得到的手套 transmissibility;(b) 特定工具(或一类工具)手柄上的振动频谱;(c) 表示不同频率振动导致伤害程度的频率加权。利用先前报道的工具振动频谱和手套 transmissibilities(10 - 1000Hz),该方法用于测试 10 副手套与 20 种不同的电动工具。
英国标准 6842(1987)和国际标准 5349(1986)中倡导的手部传递振动频率加权对手套的表观隔离有效性有很大影响。采用该频率加权时,大多数工具的手套对振动传递至手部几乎没有影响。只有两三种工具(那些以高频振动为主的工具),有手套能提供有效衰减。不采用频率加权时,一些手套对大多数电动工具的振动表现出有效衰减。
鉴于振动频率在手部传递振动导致疾病方面的影响不确定,暂建议如果手套在不采用频率加权评估时能减少振动传递,且在采用频率加权评估时不增加振动,则鼓励特定振动工具使用者佩戴手套。当前关于手套传递振动测量与评估的国际标准,当手套对振动无有效衰减时可将其归类为防振手套,而在特定工具上能提供有效振动衰减的手套可能无法通过测试。