Sentovich S M, Wong W D, Blatchford G J
Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Aug;41(8):1000-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02237390.
Although transanal ultrasound has rapidly become the test of choice for the diagnosis of anal sphincter injury, the accuracy and reliability of this technique are unknown. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior (obstetric-related) anal sphincter injury.
Sixty-two women underwent transanal ultrasound with hard-copy images obtained at 0.5-cm intervals from the anal verge to 2.5 cm into the anal canal. All transanal ultrasound procedures were also recorded on videotape. Two experienced ultrasonographers blinded as to the patients' clinical history and examination independently reviewed the images and videotape recordings for the presence or absence of anal sphincter injury.
The accuracy of transanal ultrasound in 22 incontinent women with known anal sphincter injury was 100 percent. The accuracy of transanal ultrasound in 20 nulliparous women with intact anal sphincters was only 35 percent but improved to 50 percent after the "real time" videotape was reviewed (P = 0.16) and further improved to 85 percent when interpretation was limited to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal (P = 0.004). In these nulliparous women, intact internal sphincters were more accurately predicted than intact external sphincters (95 vs. 85 percent; P = 0.24). Measurement agreement between the two ultrasonographers was 68 percent (fair; kappa, 0.26) but significantly improved to 78 percent (moderate; kappa, 0.48; P = 0.0001) when interpretation was limited to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal. Overall clinical agreement (final scan interpretation) was good (81 percent agreement; kappa, 0.61). Agreement was better for the internal sphincter (74 percent; fair; kappa, 0.36) than the external sphincter (61 percent; poor; kappa, 0.17; P = 0.0002).
Although transanal ultrasound can accurately identify anterior anal sphincter injury when present, transanal ultrasound falsely identifies sphincter injury in at least 5 to 25 percent of normal anal sphincters. Only fair agreement in the interpretation of transanal ultrasound exists between experienced ultrasonographers. Both the accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound are significantly improved by limiting transanal ultrasound to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal.
尽管经肛门超声已迅速成为诊断肛门括约肌损伤的首选检查方法,但该技术的准确性和可靠性尚不清楚。本研究评估经肛门超声诊断前部(产科相关)肛门括约肌损伤的准确性和可靠性。
62名女性接受经肛门超声检查,从肛缘至肛管内2.5 cm每隔0.5 cm获取硬拷贝图像。所有经肛门超声检查过程也都录制在录像带上。两名经验丰富的超声检查人员在对患者临床病史和检查不知情的情况下,独立查看图像和录像带记录,以确定是否存在肛门括约肌损伤。
在22名已知肛门括约肌损伤的尿失禁女性中,经肛门超声的准确性为100%。在20名肛门括约肌完整的未生育女性中,经肛门超声的准确性仅为35%,但在查看“实时”录像带后提高到50%(P = 0.16),当解释限于肛管远端1.5 cm时进一步提高到85%(P = 0.004)。在这些未生育女性中,完整的内括约肌比完整的外括约肌预测得更准确(95%对85%;P = 0.24)。两名超声检查人员之间的测量一致性为68%(一般;kappa值为0.26),但当解释限于肛管远端1.5 cm时,显著提高到78%(中等;kappa值为0.48;P = 0.0001)。总体临床一致性(最终扫描解释)良好(一致性为81%;kappa值为0.61)。内括约肌的一致性(74%;一般;kappa值为0.36)优于外括约肌(61%;差;kappa值为0.17;P = 0.0002)。
尽管经肛门超声在存在前部肛门括约肌损伤时能准确识别,但经肛门超声在至少5%至25%的正常肛门括约肌中会错误识别括约肌损伤。经验丰富的超声检查人员之间对经肛门超声的解释仅存在一般一致性。将经肛门超声检查限于肛管远端1.5 cm可显著提高其准确性和可靠性。