Cree I A, Smith W C
Department of Pathology, University College London, UK.
Lepr Rev. 1998 Jun;69(2):112-21. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19980011.
The declining prevalence of leprosy has not been matched by a declining incidence. Widespread adoption of multiple drug therapy (MDT) in closely monitored control programmes has not prevented transmission of Mycobacterium leprae. Despite the rarity of lepromatous patients, most of those living in endemic areas have immunological evidence of exposure to M. leprae. This paradox could be explained if, for many such individuals, infection was transient, did not result in disease development, but did allow the transmission of infection to other individuals. There is increasing evidence from nasal PCR studies that such sub-clinical transmission may exist and that mucosal immune responses to M. leprae may develop during resolution of initial infection. Sub-clinical infection appears to occur in clusters and may require close contact over a prolonged period for optimal transmission. Control of transmission may be feasible through identification and treatment of individuals within infection clusters, allowing progress towards the eradication of leprosy.
麻风病患病率的下降并未伴随着发病率的下降。在密切监测的控制项目中广泛采用多药联合化疗(MDT)并未阻止麻风分枝杆菌的传播。尽管瘤型患者很少见,但大多数生活在流行地区的人都有接触麻风分枝杆菌的免疫学证据。如果对于许多此类个体来说,感染是短暂的,不会导致疾病发展,但确实会将感染传播给其他个体,那么这个矛盾就可以得到解释。来自鼻腔PCR研究的证据越来越多,表明可能存在这种亚临床传播,并且在初始感染消退期间可能会产生针对麻风分枝杆菌的黏膜免疫反应。亚临床感染似乎呈聚集性发生,可能需要长时间密切接触才能实现最佳传播。通过识别和治疗感染集群中的个体来控制传播可能是可行的,从而朝着消除麻风病的目标迈进。