Robless P, Emson M, Thomas D, Mansfield A, Halliday A
Academic Surgical Unit, Imperial College School of Medicine at St. Mary's, London, U.K.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998 Jul;16(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(98)80093-2.
This study aims to determine whether asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST) centres have entered and can identify high risk patients using duplex.
Retrospective study.
Eighty-six vascular laboratories collaborating in ACST were studied, Equipment, operator experience, methodology and interpretation criteria were assessed. The ACST randomisation data were examined to determine whether patients believed to be at higher risk of stroke because of tight stenosis, contralateral occlusion or echolucent plaque were randomised.
Laboratories (92%) had colour duplex and 62% of all operators had > 3 years experience in carotid evaluation. The Doppler angle used to obtain peak velocity was 30-60 degrees in 65%, 60 degrees in 28% and 60-80 degrees in 6% of laboratories. Sixty-two per cent reported diameter reduction, 27% area reduction, and 11% used both methods. One-third of 1657 randomised patients were reported to have ipsilateral echolucent plaque. Median ipsilateral stenosis was 80%, 8% had contralateral occlusion and 8.5% had bilateral > 80% stenosis.
Centres in ACST use experienced operators, high quality equipment and conscientious data recording. Variations in methods of determining carotid stenosis exist, but can be smoothed by simple data collection. Patients at higher perceived risk of stroke are being entered and with continued recruitment it should be possible to determine whether surgery improves disabling stroke-free survival.
本研究旨在确定无症状颈动脉手术试验(ACST)中心是否已纳入并能够使用双功超声识别高危患者。
回顾性研究。
对参与ACST的86个血管实验室进行了研究,评估了设备、操作人员经验、方法和解读标准。检查ACST随机分组数据,以确定因严重狭窄、对侧闭塞或无回声斑块而被认为中风风险较高的患者是否被随机分组。
92%的实验室拥有彩色双功超声,62%的操作人员有超过3年的颈动脉评估经验。65%的实验室用于获取峰值流速的多普勒角度为30 - 60度,28%为60度,6%为60 - 80度。62%的实验室报告采用直径缩小法,27%采用面积缩小法,11%同时使用两种方法。在1657例随机分组的患者中,三分之一报告有同侧无回声斑块。同侧狭窄的中位数为80%,8%有对侧闭塞,8.5%有双侧> 80%狭窄。
ACST中心使用经验丰富的操作人员、高质量的设备并认真记录数据。在确定颈动脉狭窄的方法上存在差异,但通过简单的数据收集可以使其统一。中风风险较高的患者已被纳入研究,随着持续招募,应该能够确定手术是否能改善无致残性中风的生存期。