Shi Q, Adler I D
GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Institut für Säugetiergenetik, Neuherberg, Germany.
Mutagenesis. 1998 Jul;13(4):409-16. doi: 10.1093/mutage/13.4.409.
Colcemid (COM) and econazole (EZ) were tested for induction of mitotic arrest and C-mitotic effects in mouse bone marrow cells and for meiotic delay and induction of hyperploidy in mouse spermatocytes after single injection. Doses of 1 and 3 mg/kg COM were used and bone marrow and spermatocytes were sampled at 2, 6, 10, 14 and 18 h. For EZ a dose of 120 mg/kg and intervals of 6, 10, 14 and 18 h were chosen. At 2 h after COM treatment of bone marrow cells the mitotic index and C-mitotic effect were highest, then both decreased from 6 to 18 h. At 18 h the mitotic indices decreased to or significantly below the control level at doses of 1 and 3 mg/kg respectively, whereas the corresponding frequencies of C-mitotic cells were still significantly higher than in the controls. EZ also induced mitotic arrest and C-mitotic effects in mouse bone marrow cells. In contrast to COM, the effects of EZ were highest at 18 h after treatment. COM and EZ caused disturbances in progression from the first to second meiotic division, however, after COM treatment the ratios of MMII to MMI were significantly below the control. In contrast, after EZ treatment the ratios were significantly higher than in the controls. Such differences may result from the different mechanisms by which COM and EZ act on cell cycle progression. COM and EZ did not induce non-disjunction under the experimental conditions. However, EZ induced structural chromosomal aberrations.
对秋水仙酰胺(COM)和益康唑(EZ)进行了测试,观察其对小鼠骨髓细胞有丝分裂阻滞和C-有丝分裂效应的诱导作用,以及单次注射后对小鼠精母细胞减数分裂延迟和超倍体诱导的影响。使用了1和3 mg/kg的COM剂量,并在注射后2、6、10、14和18小时采集骨髓和精母细胞样本。对于EZ,选择了120 mg/kg的剂量以及6、10、14和18小时的时间间隔。在COM处理骨髓细胞后2小时,有丝分裂指数和C-有丝分裂效应最高,然后在6至18小时内均下降。在18小时时,1和3 mg/kg剂量组的有丝分裂指数分别降至或显著低于对照水平,而相应的C-有丝分裂细胞频率仍显著高于对照组。EZ也能诱导小鼠骨髓细胞有丝分裂阻滞和C-有丝分裂效应。与COM不同,EZ的效应在处理后18小时最高。COM和EZ均导致从第一次减数分裂向第二次减数分裂进程的紊乱,然而,COM处理后MMII与MMI的比值显著低于对照。相比之下,EZ处理后的比值显著高于对照组。这种差异可能是由于COM和EZ作用于细胞周期进程的机制不同所致。在实验条件下,COM和EZ均未诱导不分离现象。然而,EZ诱导了染色体结构畸变。