Howard G M, Nguyen T V, Harris M, Kelly P J, Eisman J A
Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Aug;13(8):1318-27. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1318.
This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty-nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins between 20 and 83 years of age (53 +/- 13 years, mean +/- SD) were studied. Digital (phalangeal) QUS (speed of sound [SOS]) and calcaneal QUS (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA] and velocity of sound [VOS]) were measured using a DBM Sonic 1200 ultrasound densitometer and a CUBA ultrasound densitometer, respectively. Femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total body (TB) BMD were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Familial resemblance and hence heritability (proportion of variance of a trait attributable to genetic factors) were assessed by analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate model-fitting genetic analyses. In both QUS and BMD parameters, MZ twins were more alike than DZ pairs. Estimates of heritability for age- and weight-adjusted BUA, VOS, and SOS were 0.74, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Corresponding indices of heritability for LS, FN, and TB BMD were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. In cross-sectional analysis, both BUA and SOS, but not VOS, were independently associated with BMD measurements. However, analysis based on intrapair differences suggested that only BUA was related to BMD. Bivariate genetic analysis indicated that the genetic correlations between BUA and BMD ranged between 0.43 and 0.51 (p < 0.001), whereas the environmental correlations ranged between 0.20 and 0.28 (p < 0.01). While the genetic correlations within QUS and BMD measurements were significant, factor analysis indicates that common genes affect BMD at different sites. Also, individual QUS measurements appear to be influenced by some common sets of genes rather than by environmental factors. Significant environmental correlations were only found for BMD measurements and ranged between 0.50 and 0.65 (p < 0.001). These data suggest that QUS and BMD measurements are highly heritable traits. While it appears that there is a common set of genes influencing both QUS and BMD measurements, specific genes yet to be identified appear to have greater effects than that of shared genes in each trait.
本研究旨在评估遗传和环境因素对定量超声(QUS)测量值的变异和协变及其与骨密度(BMD)关系的相对贡献。对49对20至83岁(平均53±13岁,均值±标准差)的单卵(MZ)女性双胞胎和44对双卵(DZ)女性双胞胎进行了研究。分别使用DBM Sonic 1200超声骨密度仪和CUBA超声骨密度仪测量指骨数字化QUS(声速[SOS])和跟骨QUS(宽带超声衰减[BUA]和声速[VOS])。使用双能X线吸收法测量股骨颈(FN)、腰椎(LS)和全身(TB)的骨密度。通过方差分析、单变量和多变量模型拟合遗传分析评估家族相似性以及遗传力(性状变异中归因于遗传因素的比例)。在QUS和BMD参数方面,MZ双胞胎比DZ双胞胎更相似。年龄和体重校正后的BUA、VOS和SOS的遗传力估计值分别为0.74、0.55和0.82。LS、FN和TB骨密度的相应遗传力指数分别为0.79、0.77和0.82。在横断面分析中,BUA和SOS均与骨密度测量值独立相关,但VOS与骨密度测量值无关。然而,基于双胞胎对内差异的分析表明,只有BUA与骨密度有关。双变量遗传分析表明,BUA与骨密度之间的遗传相关性在0.43至0.51之间(p<0.001),而环境相关性在0.20至0.28之间(p<0.01)。虽然QUS和BMD测量值之间的遗传相关性显著,但因子分析表明,共同基因影响不同部位的骨密度。此外,个体QUS测量值似乎受一些共同基因集的影响,而非环境因素。仅在骨密度测量中发现显著的环境相关性,范围在0.50至0.65之间(p<0.001)。这些数据表明,QUS和BMD测量是高度可遗传的性状。虽然似乎有一组共同基因影响QUS和BMD测量,但尚未确定的特定基因在每个性状中似乎比共享基因有更大的影响。