• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较退伍军人事务部医院、营利性医院和非营利性医院在变革准备情况、质量改进和成本管理方面的差异。

Comparing change readiness, quality improvement, and cost management among Veterans Administration, for-profit, and nonprofit hospitals.

作者信息

West T D

机构信息

Iowa State University, Ames, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 1998 Fall;25(1):46-58.

PMID:9718511
Abstract

Health care organizations throughout the country are facing increasing pressure to improve their quality of care while reducing cost. This article describes a model of organizational change and develops a change readiness matrix that managers can use to benchmark their organization's performance on three dimensions: (1) change readiness, (2) quality improvement, and (3) cost management. The model and the matrix combine to offer managers a framework for pursuing organizational change and operational innovation within their organization. A survey methodology is used to compare VA hospitals (n = 44), for-profit hospitals (n = 108), and nonprofit hospitals (n = 449) on the three performance dimensions. The results indicate that Veterans Administration hospitals react differently than either for-profit or nonprofit hospitals on these dimensions. However, responses from for-profit and nonprofit hospitals were not significantly different from each other. Additional insights are presented into how hospitals in general can facilitate the organizational change process.

摘要

全国各地的医疗保健机构都面临着越来越大的压力,需要在降低成本的同时提高医疗质量。本文描述了一种组织变革模型,并开发了一个变革准备矩阵,管理者可以用它来衡量组织在三个维度上的绩效:(1)变革准备情况,(2)质量改进,以及(3)成本管理。该模型和矩阵相结合,为管理者提供了一个在组织内部推动组织变革和运营创新的框架。采用调查方法,对44家退伍军人管理局医院、108家营利性医院和449家非营利性医院在这三个绩效维度上进行比较。结果表明,退伍军人管理局医院在这些维度上的反应与营利性或非营利性医院不同。然而,营利性医院和非营利性医院的反应彼此之间没有显著差异。文中还提供了关于医院总体上如何促进组织变革过程的更多见解。

相似文献

1
Comparing change readiness, quality improvement, and cost management among Veterans Administration, for-profit, and nonprofit hospitals.比较退伍军人事务部医院、营利性医院和非营利性医院在变革准备情况、质量改进和成本管理方面的差异。
J Health Care Finance. 1998 Fall;25(1):46-58.
2
Analysis of the rationale for, and consequences of, nonprofit and for-profit ownership conversions.非营利性与营利性所有权转换的基本原理及后果分析。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 1):83-101.
3
A market, operation, and mission assessment of large rural for-profit hospitals with positive cash flow.对具有正现金流的大型农村营利性医院的市场、运营及使命评估。
J Rural Health. 2007 Winter;23(1):10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00062.x.
4
Hospital control and decision making: a financial perspective.医院管理与决策:财务视角
Healthc Financ Manage. 1993 Jun;47(6):90, 92, 94-5.
5
Evaluating the sale of a nonprofit health system to a for-profit hospital management company: the Legacy Experience.评估一家非营利性医疗系统出售给一家营利性医院管理公司的情况:遗产医院的经历
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 1):103-21.
6
Nonprofit conversion: theory, evidence, and state policy options.非营利性转变:理论、证据及国家政策选择
Health Serv Res. 1998 Dec;33(5 Pt 2):1495-535.
7
Hospital ownership and medical services: market mix, spillover effects, and nonprofit objectives.医院所有权与医疗服务:市场组合、溢出效应与非营利目标
J Health Econ. 2009 Sep;28(5):924-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
8
The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care.退伍军人健康管理局:质量、价值、问责制和信息作为以患者为中心的护理的转型策略。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):828-36.
9
A comparative analysis of revenue and cost-management strategies of not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals.非营利性医院与营利性医院收入及成本管理策略的比较分析
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1997 Spring;42(1):117-34.
10
Making profits and providing care: comparing nonprofit, for-profit, and government hospitals.盈利与提供医疗服务:非营利性、营利性及政府医院之比较
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 May-Jun;24(3):790-801. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.790.

引用本文的文献

1
Using public reports of patient satisfaction for hospital quality improvement.利用患者满意度公开报告促进医院质量改进。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 1):663-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00508.x.