Dongieux J W, Block M S, Morris G, Gardiner D, Dean K
LSU School of Dentistry, New Orelans.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Aug;86(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90116-0.
The aim of this study was to compare resorbable membranes, nonresorbable membranes, and no coverage with respect to onlay bone graft healing in a dog.
Each of four dogs had six corticocancellous blocks of ramus bone placed bilaterally as onlay grafts to the inferior lateral aspect of the mandible. On each side, one graft was left uncovered, one was covered with a collagen membrane, and one was covered with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. Volume determinations were made at the time of graft placement and when the animals were killed.
There were no statistically significant differences in bone volume or histologic outcome among the three groups.
本研究旨在比较可吸收膜、不可吸收膜以及不覆盖任何膜的情况下,犬进行嵌体骨移植愈合的情况。
4只犬,每只犬双侧下颌骨外侧下方放置6块松质骨皮质骨块作为嵌体移植。每侧,一块移植骨不覆盖任何膜,一块覆盖胶原膜,一块覆盖膨体聚四氟乙烯膜。在植入移植骨时和处死动物时进行体积测定。
三组之间在骨体积或组织学结果方面无统计学显著差异。