Comparison of endoscopy and radiographic fluoroscopy in the evaluation of pediatric congenital airway abnormalities.

In order to assess the accuracy of conventional dynamic radiographic studies compared to endoscopy in the diagnosis of congenital airway abnormalities, we performed a retrospective chart review for the period between July 1991 to June 1996. A total of 186 patients were identified who required hospitalization for their respiratory status as a result of a congenital airway abnormality. Of these, 19% had both endoscopy and conventional dynamic radiographic evaluation (airway fluoroscopy, barium esophagography, or both). Eleven percent had fluoroscopy only, 62% had endoscopy only, and 9% had neither. In those patients who underwent both endoscopic and conventional dynamic radiographic evaluation, endoscopy was considered to be the definitive procedure for diagnosis. Laryngomalacia was present in 94% of these patients. Thirteen patients had multiple sites of airway abnormalities on endoscopy, and a total of 51 abnormalities were identified. Dynamic radiographic evaluation was correct in four, was suggestive of the abnormality in 12, did not recognize an abnormality in 33, and suggested a different diagnosis (not corresponding to endoscopy) in two. Thus, airway fluoroscopy and/or barium esophagography were correct or suggestive in 16 of 51 abnormalities (31%). We conclude that endoscopy is required in the majority of hospitalized patients for the precise diagnosis of a congenital airway abnormality. Conventional dynamic radiographic studies are helpful to confirm a suspected diagnosis in patients with a strong clinical history and physical examination. When the diagnosis is not clear based on the patient presentation, endoscopy is more definitive than conventional dynamic radiography in identifying pediatric congenital airway abnormalities.