Suppr超能文献

与儿童行为评估相关的方法因素:是事实还是人为现象?

Method factors associated with assessment of child behavior: fact or artifact?

作者信息

Miller L C

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(3):209-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00917759.

Abstract

A sample of 64 phobic children between the ages of 6 and 16, with their general population matched controls, were rated by parents on the Louisville Behavior Check List and Louisville Fear survey and by School Behavior check list. The analysis of ratings by factor analysis revealed three instrument factors while a multiple discriminant analysis elicited a multidimensional phobic trait that crossed observers, situations, and instruments. The results are discussed in terms of the implications for multivariant analysis of behavior change as well as for classification of psychopathological disorders of childhood. The thesis is advanced that instrument factors elicited by factor analysis in psychotherapy change studies are statistical artifacts and that a multiple discriminant analysis is a more appropriate technique for the study of change as well as for classification.

摘要

对64名6至16岁的恐惧症儿童及其作为对照的普通人群样本,由父母根据《路易斯维尔行为检查表》《路易斯维尔恐惧调查》以及《学校行为检查表》进行评分。通过因子分析对评分进行分析,揭示了三个工具因素,而多重判别分析得出了一个跨越观察者、情境和工具的多维度恐惧特质。从行为变化的多变量分析以及儿童心理病理障碍分类的意义方面对结果进行了讨论。本文提出,心理治疗变化研究中通过因子分析得出的工具因素是统计假象,多重判别分析是研究变化以及分类的更合适技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验