Martin A, Millard P H
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1976 Nov;24(11):506-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1976.tb03273.x.
The work load of three day hospitals attached to active departments of Geriatric Medicine was studied over a one-year period. A significant difference in the functional efficiency of the three units was noted. The smaller 12-place and 15-place units provided effective short-term rehabilitation, whereas the 28-place unit did not. Size seemed to be the major factor in the success or failure of a given unit. This study throws serious doubts upon the wisdom of a policy of building large day hospitals with all their accompanying problems of staffing and transport. An effective unit for out-patient rehabilitation can be provided with 10 to 15 places per day if the staff members are chiefly remedial therapists. In the districts studied, a provision of 0.5 place per 1,000 of the population aged 65 or older would have been sufficient to meet the perceived need for rehabilitation. However, this would not have been sufficient to satisfy the requirement for out-patient investigation and medical treatment on a day basis.
对老年医学各活跃科室所属的三家日间医院的工作量进行了为期一年的研究。注意到这三个科室在功能效率上存在显著差异。规模较小的拥有12个床位和15个床位的科室提供了有效的短期康复服务,而拥有28个床位的科室则不然。规模似乎是特定科室成败的主要因素。这项研究对建造大型日间医院及其伴随而来的人员配备和交通问题的政策的明智性提出了严重质疑。如果工作人员主要是康复治疗师,一个有效的门诊康复科室每天可设置10至15个床位。在所研究的地区,每1000名65岁及以上的老年人提供0.5个床位就足以满足康复的预期需求。然而,这不足以满足日间门诊检查和治疗的需求。