• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

敌对个体对其工作生活中压力变化的反应:一种心理社会脆弱性模型的测试

Response of hostile individuals to stressful changes in their working lives: test of a psychosocial vulnerability model.

作者信息

Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Koskenvuo M, Uutela A, Pentti J

机构信息

University of Turku, Department of Public Health, Finland.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 1998 Jul;28(4):903-13. doi: 10.1017/s003329179800659x.

DOI:10.1017/s003329179800659x
PMID:9723145
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the psychosocial vulnerability model, the health of hostile individuals is at greater risk than that of non-hostile individuals, due partly to lesser ability of the former to cope with psychosocial stress situations. We examined whether hostile individuals were more vulnerable than others to health problems when faced with stressful changes in their working lives.

METHODS

Hostility, sickness absence and psychosocial stressors in 866 local government employees over a 5-year period, which included severe economic decline, were investigated. Hostility was measured by a questionnaire. Data on medically certified sickness absence were obtained from the records of the local authority. Information about exposure to psychosocial stressors after assessment of hostility was also derived from these records, and from the subjects.

RESULTS

Exposure to stressors during the period of economic decline was related to increased rates of sickness absence. In men, hostility increased risk of sickness absence after exposure to stressors only in cases of absence because of trauma. In women, hostility increased risk of absence through sickness overall and absence because of musculoskeletal disorders in individuals facing stressors such as severe organizational downsizing, high or increased levels of job demands or negative change in work. Findings were adjusted for sickness absence at the beginning of the decline, socio-economic background and behavioural risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychosocial vulnerability model was partly supported. However, heightened vulnerability through hostility may differ between the sexes, since it was more evident in the women studied than in the men.

摘要

背景

根据心理社会脆弱性模型,怀有敌意的个体比非敌意个体的健康面临更大风险,部分原因是前者应对心理社会压力情境的能力较弱。我们研究了在工作生活中面临压力变化时,怀有敌意的个体是否比其他人更容易出现健康问题。

方法

对866名地方政府雇员在包括严重经济衰退在内的5年期间的敌意、病假情况和心理社会压力源进行了调查。敌意通过问卷调查进行测量。经医学证明的病假数据从地方当局的记录中获取。在评估敌意后,关于接触心理社会压力源的信息也来自这些记录以及受试者。

结果

经济衰退期间接触压力源与病假率上升有关。在男性中,只有在因创伤而缺勤的情况下,敌意才会增加接触压力源后病假的风险。在女性中,敌意总体上增加了因病缺勤的风险,以及在面临诸如严重机构精简、工作要求高或增加或工作出现负面变化等压力源的个体中因肌肉骨骼疾病而缺勤的风险。研究结果针对衰退开始时的病假情况、社会经济背景和行为风险因素进行了调整。

结论

心理社会脆弱性模型得到了部分支持。然而,由于敌意导致的更高脆弱性在不同性别之间可能存在差异,因为在我们研究的女性中比男性中更明显。

相似文献

1
Response of hostile individuals to stressful changes in their working lives: test of a psychosocial vulnerability model.敌对个体对其工作生活中压力变化的反应:一种心理社会脆弱性模型的测试
Psychol Med. 1998 Jul;28(4):903-13. doi: 10.1017/s003329179800659x.
2
Hostility and ill health: role of psychosocial resources in two contexts of working life.敌意与健康问题:心理社会资源在两种工作生活情境中的作用
J Psychosom Res. 2000 Jan;48(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00080-x.
3
Hostility, unemployment and health status: testing three theoretical models.敌意、失业与健康状况:对三种理论模型的检验
Soc Sci Med. 2003 May;56(10):2139-52. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00219-8.
4
Job strain and psychologic distress influence on sickness absence among Finnish employees.工作压力与心理困扰对芬兰员工病假缺勤的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Sep;33(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.003.
5
Psychosocial factors predicting employee sickness absence during economic decline.经济衰退期间预测员工病假缺勤的社会心理因素。
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Dec;82(6):858-72. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.858.
6
Explanations for gender differences in sickness absence: evidence from middle-aged municipal employees from Finland.病假中性别差异的解释:来自芬兰中年市政雇员的证据。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 May;65(5):325-30. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.033910. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
7
Sickness absence and psychosocial job quality: an analysis from a longitudinal survey of working Australians, 2005-2012.病假与心理社会工作质量:对2005 - 2012年澳大利亚在职人员的纵向调查分析
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 May 15;181(10):781-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu355. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
8
The mental health effects of multiple work and family demands. A prospective study of psychiatric sickness absence in the French GAZEL study.多种工作和家庭需求对心理健康的影响。法国GAZEL研究中关于精神疾病缺勤情况的前瞻性研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):573-82. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0203-2. Epub 2007 May 24.
9
Hostility and registered sickness absences: a prospective study of municipal employees.
Psychol Med. 1997 May;27(3):693-701. doi: 10.1017/s0033291797004832.
10
Effort--reward imbalance and medically certified absence for mental health problems: a prospective study of white-collar workers.工作投入-回报失衡与因心理健康问题请医疗病假:一项对白领人群的前瞻性研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jan;71(1):40-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101375. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Workplace discrimination as risk factor for long-term sickness absence: Longitudinal analyses of onset and changes in workplace adversity.工作场所歧视作为长期病假的风险因素:工作场所逆境的发病和变化的纵向分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255697. eCollection 2021.
2
The joint effect of unemployment and cynical hostility on all-cause mortality: results from a prospective cohort study.失业与愤世嫉俗的敌意对全因死亡率的联合影响:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6622-7.
3
Association of hostility with sleep duration and sleep disturbances in an employee population.
员工群体中敌意与睡眠时间及睡眠障碍的关联
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(2):73-80. doi: 10.1080/10705500801929510.
4
Sickness absence as a global measure of health: evidence from mortality in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.以病假作为健康的综合衡量指标:来自怀特霍尔二世前瞻性队列研究中死亡率的证据。
BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):364. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.364.