Davey P J, Schulz M, Gliksman M, Dobson M, Aristides M, Stephens N G
M-TAG Pty Ltd, Chatswood NSW, Australia.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 15;82(4):414-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00354-3.
Epidemiologic studies have suggested that vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) may play a preventive role in reducing the incidence of atherosclerosis. The aim of this paper was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of vitamin E supplementation in patients with coronary artery disease using data from the Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS). The study compared cost-effectiveness in the context of Australian and United States (US) health care utilization. The main clinical outcome used in the economic evaluation was the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) which was nonfatal. Utilization of health care resources was estimated by conducting a survey of Australian clinicians and published Australian and US cost data. Cost savings of $127 (A$181) and $578/patient randomized to vitamin E therapy compared with patients receiving placebo were found for Australian and US settings, respectively. Savings in the vitamin E group were due primarily to reduction in hospital admissions for AMI. This occurred because the vitamin E group had a 4.4% lower absolute risk of AMI than did the placebo group. Less than 10% of health care costs in the Australian evaluation was due to vitamin E ($150 [A$214/patient]). Our economic evaluation indicates that vitamin E therapy in patients with angiographically proven atherosclerosis is cost-effective in the Australian and US settings.
流行病学研究表明,维生素E(α-生育酚)可能在降低动脉粥样硬化发病率方面发挥预防作用。本文旨在利用剑桥心脏抗氧化研究(CHAOS)的数据,对冠心病患者补充维生素E进行成本效益分析。该研究比较了澳大利亚和美国医疗保健利用背景下的成本效益。经济评估中使用的主要临床结局是非致命性急性心肌梗死(AMI)的发病率。通过对澳大利亚临床医生进行调查以及公布的澳大利亚和美国成本数据来估计医疗保健资源的利用情况。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,随机接受维生素E治疗的患者在澳大利亚和美国的环境中分别节省了127美元(181澳元)和578美元/患者。维生素E组的节省主要归因于AMI住院人数的减少。这是因为维生素E组的AMI绝对风险比安慰剂组低4.4%。在澳大利亚的评估中,不到10%的医疗保健成本归因于维生素E(150美元[214澳元/患者])。我们的经济评估表明,在澳大利亚和美国的环境中,对血管造影证实患有动脉粥样硬化的患者进行维生素E治疗具有成本效益。