• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性青霉素皮肤试验和阿莫西林激发试验:对门诊抗生素使用、成本及临床结局的影响

Elective penicillin skin testing and amoxicillin challenge: effect on outpatient antibiotic use, cost, and clinical outcomes.

作者信息

Macy E

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente, San Diego Medical Center, Department of Allergy, UCSD School of Medicine, Calif, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 Aug;102(2):281-5. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70097-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70097-1
PMID:9723673
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elective penicillin skin testing in advance of acute antibiotic need and amoxicillin challenge in patients with negative skin test responses have not been evaluated.

METHODS

I reviewed 236 patients previously entered in a study of new penicillin reagents who received at least 1 prescription drug over a 2-year period. Antibiotic use, outpatient visit rate, and adverse reactions to antibiotics during the year before and after skin testing were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty (17%) of the 236 subjects had positive responses. Antibiotic courses dispensed to the 236 subjects fell 28% from 779 the year before testing to 558 the year after testing. The total cost for antibiotics dispensed fell 32% from $17,211.88 to $11,648.27, with a 5.5% reduction in the average cost per antibiotic. Outpatient visit rate did not change but shifted from primary to specialty departments in subjects with both positive and negative skin test responses. In 93 subjects with negative skin test responses, a total of 188 therapeutic courses of penicillin during the year after testing resulted in 3 (3.2%) unrechallenged mild adverse reactions. Optional amoxicillin challenge in 146 of the subjects with negative skin test responses resulted in complaints of an adverse reaction in 6 of these subjects. Four of these received a penicillin analogue in the next year without reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective penicillin skin testing done by an allergist was associated with unexpected declines in the number and cost of antibiotics used the year after testing but only modestly lowered the average cost per antibiotic. Adverse reactions to penicillins in subjects with negative skin test responses were infrequent, and amoxicillin challenge did not affect outcomes.

摘要

背景

在急性需要抗生素之前进行选择性青霉素皮肤试验以及对皮肤试验反应阴性的患者进行阿莫西林激发试验尚未得到评估。

方法

我回顾了236名先前参与一项新型青霉素试剂研究的患者,这些患者在两年期间至少接受了1种处方药治疗。评估了皮肤试验前后一年的抗生素使用情况、门诊就诊率以及抗生素不良反应。

结果

236名受试者中有40名(17%)反应呈阳性。分配给这236名受试者的抗生素疗程从试验前一年的779个降至试验后一年的558个,下降了28%。抗生素配药总成本从17,211.88美元降至11,648.27美元,下降了32%,每种抗生素的平均成本降低了5.5%。门诊就诊率没有变化,但皮肤试验反应阳性和阴性的受试者的门诊就诊科室从初级科室转向了专科科室。在93名皮肤试验反应阴性的受试者中,试验后一年共进行了188个青霉素治疗疗程,导致3例(3.2%)未经再次激发的轻度不良反应。对146名皮肤试验反应阴性的受试者进行的选择性阿莫西林激发试验导致其中6名受试者出现不良反应投诉。其中4人在次年接受了青霉素类似物治疗,未出现反应。

结论

由过敏症专科医生进行的选择性青霉素皮肤试验与试验后一年使用的抗生素数量和成本意外下降有关,但仅适度降低了每种抗生素的平均成本。皮肤试验反应阴性的受试者对青霉素的不良反应很少见,阿莫西林激发试验并未影响结果。

相似文献

1
Elective penicillin skin testing and amoxicillin challenge: effect on outpatient antibiotic use, cost, and clinical outcomes.选择性青霉素皮肤试验和阿莫西林激发试验:对门诊抗生素使用、成本及临床结局的影响
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 Aug;102(2):281-5. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70097-1.
2
Diagnosis of penicillin, amoxicillin, and cephalosporin allergy: reliability of examination assessed by skin testing and oral challenge.青霉素、阿莫西林和头孢菌素过敏的诊断:通过皮肤试验和口服激发试验评估检查的可靠性。
J Pediatr. 1998 Jan;132(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70499-8.
3
Skin testing with penicilloate and penilloate prepared by an improved method: amoxicillin oral challenge in patients with negative skin test responses to penicillin reagents.采用改良方法制备的青霉素盐和青霉噻唑酸盐进行皮肤试验:对青霉素试剂皮肤试验反应阴性的患者进行阿莫西林口服激发试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Nov;100(5):586-91. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70159-3.
4
Skin testing and oral amoxicillin challenge in the outpatient allergy and clinical immunology clinic in pregnant women with penicillin allergy.在有青霉素过敏史的孕妇的门诊过敏和临床免疫学诊所中进行皮肤试验和口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Dec;125(6):646-651. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Comparing Direct Challenge to Penicillin Skin Testing for the Outpatient Evaluation of Penicillin Allergy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.直接挑战与青霉素皮试用于门诊青霉素过敏评估的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2163-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
6
Oral antibiotic adverse reactions after penicillin skin testing: multi-year follow-up.青霉素皮肤试验后口服抗生素不良反应:多年随访
Allergy. 2002 Dec;57(12):1151-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23700.x.
7
Penicillin skin testing in hospitalized patients with β-lactam allergies: Effect on antibiotic selection and cost.对有β-内酰胺类过敏的住院患者进行青霉素皮肤试验:对抗生素选择和成本的影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Jul;117(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
Skin testing and oral penicillin challenge in patients with a history of remote penicillin allergy.有青霉素远期过敏史患者的皮肤试验及口服青霉素激发试验
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jan;100(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60402-4.
9
Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy.在报告有青霉素过敏的成年过敏患者且低风险患者中,不进行初步皮肤试验直接口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jan 1;40(1):57-61. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184.
10
Safely diagnosing clinically significant penicillin allergy using only penicilloyl-poly-lysine, penicillin, and oral amoxicillin.仅使用青霉素酰化多聚赖氨酸、青霉素和口服阿莫西林安全诊断临床显著青霉素过敏。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 May-Jun;1(3):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic use and financial impact of a comprehensive beta-lactam allergy management program.一项综合性β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏管理计划的抗生素使用情况及财务影响
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 10;5(1):e83. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.36. eCollection 2025.
2
Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at delabeling low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.针对考虑性别因素的旨在消除低危青霉素过敏标签的干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析议定书。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;13(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02671-5.
3
The Impact of Reported β-Lactam Allergy on Clinical Outcomes and Antibiotic Use Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
报告的β-内酰胺类药物过敏对实体器官移植受者临床结局及抗生素使用的影响
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 29;9(8):ofac384. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac384. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Penicillin Allergy De-labeling Results in Significant Changes in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns.青霉素过敏去标签化导致门诊抗生素处方模式发生显著变化。
Front Allergy. 2020 Dec 16;1:586301. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2020.586301. eCollection 2020.
5
Assessing Use of a Standardized Allergy History Questionnaire for Patients with Reported Allergy to Penicillin.评估标准化过敏史问卷在报告对青霉素过敏患者中的应用。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Spring;74(2):104-109. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
Viral Infections and Cutaneous Drug-Related Eruptions.病毒感染与皮肤药物相关疹
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 10;11:586407. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.586407. eCollection 2020.
7
High-cost, high-need patients: the impact of reported penicillin allergy.高费用、高需求患者:青霉素过敏报告的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Apr;26(4):154-161. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42832.
8
Penicillin Allergy Testing Is Cost-Saving: An Economic Evaluation Study.青霉素过敏测试具有成本效益:一项经济评估研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 15;72(6):924-938. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa194.
9
Penicillin skin testing in methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: A cost-effectiveness analysis.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症中青霉素皮肤试验:成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0210271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210271. eCollection 2019.
10
Diagnosing and managing drug allergy.药物过敏的诊断与管理。
CMAJ. 2018 Apr 30;190(17):E532-E538. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171315.