Hills Thomas, Arroll Nicola, Duffy Eamon, Capstick Janice, Jordan Anthony, Fitzharris Penny
Department of Immunology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Front Allergy. 2020 Dec 16;1:586301. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2020.586301. eCollection 2020.
Unverified penicillin allergies are common but most patients with a penicillin allergy label can safely use penicillin antibiotics. Penicillin allergy labels are associated with poor clinical outcomes and overuse of second-line antibiotics. There is increasing focus on penicillin allergy "de-labeling" as a tool to improve antibiotic prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship. The effect of outpatient penicillin allergy de-labeling on long-term antibiotic use is uncertain. We performed a retrospective pre- and post- study of antibiotic dispensing patterns, from an electronic dispensing data repository, in patients undergoing penicillin allergy assessment at Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand. Over a mean follow-up of 4.55 years, 215/304 (70.7%) of de-labeled patients were dispensed a penicillin antibiotic. Rates of penicillin antibiotic dispensing were 0.24 (0.18-0.30) penicillin courses per year before de-labeling and 0.80 (0.67-0.93) following de-labeling with a reduction in total antibiotic use from 2.30 (2.06-2.54) to 1.79 (1.59-1.99) antibiotic courses per year. In de-labeled patients, the proportion of antibiotic courses that were penicillin antibiotics increased from 12.81 to 39.62%. Rates of macrolide, cephalosporin, trimethoprim/co-trimoxazole, fluoroquinolone, "other" non-penicillin antibiotic use, and broad-spectrum antibiotic use were all lower following de-labeling. Further, antibiotic costs were lower following de-labeling. In this study, penicillin allergy de-labeling was associated with significant changes in antibiotic dispensing patterns.
未经证实的青霉素过敏很常见,但大多数被贴上青霉素过敏标签的患者可以安全地使用青霉素类抗生素。青霉素过敏标签与不良的临床结果以及二线抗生素的过度使用有关。越来越多的人将青霉素过敏“去标签化”作为改善抗生素处方和抗菌药物管理的一种手段。门诊青霉素过敏去标签化对长期抗生素使用的影响尚不确定。我们对新西兰奥克兰市医院接受青霉素过敏评估的患者,从电子配药数据存储库中提取抗生素配药模式进行了一项回顾性前后对照研究。在平均4.55年的随访中,215/304(70.7%)名去标签化患者使用了青霉素类抗生素。去标签化前每年青霉素类抗生素的配药率为0.24(0.18 - 0.30)个青霉素疗程,去标签化后为0.80(0.67 - 0.93)个疗程,每年抗生素总使用量从2.30(2.06 - 2.54)个疗程降至1.79(1.59 - 1.99)个疗程。在去标签化的患者中,青霉素类抗生素在抗生素疗程中所占比例从12.81%增至39.62%。去标签化后,大环内酯类、头孢菌素类、甲氧苄啶/复方磺胺甲恶唑、氟喹诺酮类、“其他”非青霉素类抗生素的使用率以及广谱抗生素的使用率均降低。此外,去标签化后抗生素成本降低。在本研究中,青霉素过敏去标签化与抗生素配药模式的显著变化有关。