Suppr超能文献

用于检测猫感染鹦鹉热衣原体的DNA扩增、分离及血清学方法比较

A comparison of DNA amplification, isolation and serology for the detection of Chlamydia psittaci infection in cats.

作者信息

McDonald M, Willett B J, Jarrett O, Addie D D

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden.

出版信息

Vet Rec. 1998 Jul 25;143(4):97-101. doi: 10.1136/vr.143.4.97.

Abstract

Chlamydia psittaci is a significant cause of conjunctivitis in cats, but can be difficult to diagnose owing to the small number of organisms in conjunctival swabs. In the United Kingdom laboratory diagnosis is based on three techniques: isolation of the infectious organism, amplification of chlamydial DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or the detection of anti-chlamydial antibodies by immunofluorescence assay. To determine the most sensitive method these techniques were compared in the field. The PCR based on previously published protocols was less sensitive than isolation, but by modifying the protocol its sensitivity was increased by a factor of 25 to 1250 and it was then more sensitive than isolation. The modified PCR detected chlamydia in samples containing non-infectious organisms. Serology was of limited use in predicting which cats shed C psittaci although seronegative cats were negative by PCR and isolation. The modified PCR was the most sensitive and robust method for confirming C psittaci infection in cases of conjunctivitis in pet cats.

摘要

鹦鹉热衣原体是猫结膜炎的一个重要病因,但由于结膜拭子中的病原体数量较少,可能难以诊断。在英国,实验室诊断基于三种技术:分离感染性生物体、通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增衣原体DNA或通过免疫荧光测定检测抗衣原体抗体。为了确定最敏感的方法,在实际应用中对这些技术进行了比较。基于先前公布方案的PCR不如分离法敏感,但通过修改方案,其敏感性提高了25至1250倍,随后比分离法更敏感。改良后的PCR能在含有非感染性生物体的样本中检测到衣原体。血清学在预测哪些猫排出鹦鹉热衣原体方面作用有限,尽管血清阴性的猫通过PCR和分离法检测均为阴性。改良后的PCR是确诊宠物猫结膜炎病例中鹦鹉热衣原体感染的最敏感、最可靠的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验