Fagiolino P, Vazquez M
Department of Pharmacology and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Chemistry, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1998 Apr-Jun;23(2):153-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03189332.
Bioavailability and bioequivalence evaluations of drug products carried out using the experimental maximum concentration (Cmax) and the experimental time to reach Cmax (Tmax), are not advisable for slow-release formulations and for trials performed with saliva as biologic fluid. When slow-release curves are considered the drug concentration profiles usually show multiple peaks, making it difficult to compute a Cmax,Tmax value. The saliva profile throughout time shows a high variability observed as more than one peak in the saliva concentration versus time curves. In both cases, even if there is a major peak, when the statistical analysis of the data is performed, an important variability in Cmax results in high values in the residual variance of the ANOVA test. Consequently, the power of the bioequivalence test decreases and sometimes it is not possible to conclude on bioequivalence. The average concentration (Cav), the average maximum concentration (Cmax,av) and Cmax,av/Cav x 100 (%Cmax,av) are proposed in this paper as possible parameters in order to evaluate the profile of the concentration-time curves, as they reduce the residual variability in bioequivalence studies.
对于缓释制剂以及以唾液作为生物流体进行的试验,采用实验最大浓度(Cmax)和达到Cmax的实验时间(Tmax)来进行药品的生物利用度和生物等效性评估是不可取的。当考虑缓释曲线时,药物浓度曲线通常会出现多个峰值,这使得计算Cmax、Tmax值变得困难。随着时间推移,唾液浓度曲线在唾液浓度与时间曲线上呈现出多个峰值,显示出较高的变异性。在这两种情况下,即使存在一个主要峰值,在进行数据统计分析时,Cmax的重要变异性会导致方差分析测试的残差方差值较高。因此,生物等效性测试的效能会降低,有时甚至无法得出生物等效性的结论。本文提出平均浓度(Cav)、平均最大浓度(Cmax,av)和Cmax,av/Cav×100(%Cmax,av)作为评估浓度-时间曲线特征的可能参数,因为它们可减少生物等效性研究中的残差变异性。