Pattnaik B, Venkataramanan R, Tosh C, Sanyal A, Hemadri D, Samuel A R, Knowles N J, Kitching R P
Central Laboratory, All India Coordinated Research Project on Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Mukteswar-Kumaon, Nainital.
Virus Res. 1998 Jun;55(2):115-27. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(98)00044-6.
The sequence of 165 nucleotides at the 3' end of the 1D gene, determined from RT PCR amplified cDNA fragments, of 25 type O strains isolated from different parts/regions of India during 1987 1995 and the vaccine strain (R2/75) currently in use in India were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. One isolate from the neighbouring country Nepal was also included in the study. The virus/ field strains showed high degree of genetic heterogeneity among themselves with % divergence in nucleotide sequence ranging from 1.2 to 19.4%. The Indian strains were much away (13.3 20.6%) from the exotic type O strains of O1BFS, O1K, and O1Campos. The type O strains analyzed were classified into three genotypes basing on level of divergence observed in nucleotide sequence. The type O vaccine virus (R2/75) was > 71% divergent (7.3-15.2%) from the field strains which revealed significant ( > 5%) genetic heterogeneity between the two. The phylogenetic analysis identified three distinct lineages, viz., (i) lineage 1 represented by the exotic strains, (ii) lineage 2 represented by 25 of the field strains which clustered into seven subgroups/sublines (2a-2g), and (iii) lineage 3 represented by a unique field isolate which shared the branching/origin with the vaccine strain. The lineage 2 which comprised of 25 of the 26 type O field strains analyzed, was placed almost at equidistance from the lineages 1 and 3 in the phylogenetic tree. The vaccine strain was closer to the viruses in lineage 2. Though there was no specific distribution pattern of sequences in different geographical regions of India, the viruses/ sequences in subgroup 2f appeared to be restricted to the southern states. Comparison of deduced amino acid sequence in the immunodominant regions 133-160 and 200-208 of the 1D gene product (VP1) showed that the two viruses in lineage 3 had unique amino acid residues at the positions 138 (D), 139 (G), 144 (I), and 158 (A) compared to rest of the strains including the exotic ones. Comparison of amino acid residues at critical positions 144, 148, 149, 151, 153, 154, and 208 revealed similarity between the type O strains analyzed. The virus strains showed variation (V/L/I) at position 144. One field strain showed replacement from Q149-->E and another from P208-->L. Thus, the study revealed that the type O FMD virus populations circulating in India and causing disease outbreaks are genetically much heterogeneous but related at the immunodominant region of VP1 polypeptide, and there are more than one genetically distinct virus populations in almost every region of the country which is possible due to unrestricted animal movement in the country. The involvement of vaccine virus in disease outbreaks was ruled out as the field strains (excluding the one in lineage 3) were phylogenetically distinct from it.
对1987年至1995年期间从印度不同地区分离出的25株O型毒株以及印度目前使用的疫苗株(R2/75)的1D基因3'端165个核苷酸序列(通过RT-PCR扩增的cDNA片段确定)进行了系统发育分析。研究中还纳入了来自邻国尼泊尔的一株分离株。病毒/田间毒株之间显示出高度的遗传异质性,核苷酸序列的差异百分比在1.2%至19.4%之间。印度毒株与O1BFS、O1K和O1Campos等外来O型毒株差异很大(13.3%至20.6%)。根据核苷酸序列观察到的差异水平,所分析的O型毒株被分为三种基因型。O型疫苗病毒(R2/75)与田间毒株的差异>71%(7.3%至15.2%),这表明两者之间存在显著(>5%)的遗传异质性。系统发育分析确定了三个不同的谱系,即:(i)以外来毒株为代表的谱系1;(ii)以25株田间毒株为代表的谱系2,这些毒株聚为七个亚组/亚系(2a - 2g);(iii)以一个独特的田间分离株为代表的谱系3,该分离株与疫苗株具有共同的分支/起源。在系统发育树中,由26株分析的O型田间毒株中的25株组成的谱系2与谱系1和谱系3的距离几乎相等。疫苗株与谱系2中的病毒更接近。尽管在印度不同地理区域没有序列的特定分布模式,但2f亚组中的病毒/序列似乎局限于南部各州。对1D基因产物(VP1)免疫显性区域133 - 160和200 - 208推导的氨基酸序列进行比较表明,与包括外来毒株在内的其他毒株相比,谱系3中的两种病毒在138(D)、139(G)、144(I)和158(A)位置具有独特的氨基酸残基。对关键位置144、148、149、151、153、154和208的氨基酸残基进行比较,发现所分析的O型毒株之间具有相似性。病毒毒株在144位置显示出变异(V/L/I)。一株田间毒株显示149位的Q被E取代,另一株显示208位的P被L取代。因此,该研究表明,在印度传播并引发疾病爆发的O型口蹄疫病毒群体在遗传上高度异质,但在VP1多肽的免疫显性区域相关,并且由于该国动物流动不受限制,该国几乎每个地区都存在不止一种遗传上不同的病毒群体。由于田间毒株(不包括谱系3中的毒株)在系统发育上与疫苗毒株不同,因此排除了疫苗病毒参与疾病爆发的可能性。