Pappas G P, Brodkin C A, Sheppard L, Balmes J, Horike M, Barnhart S
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Chest. 1998 Aug;114(2):513-20. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.2.513.
To evaluate the validity of a state-of-the-art computerized planimetry technique for estimation of total lung capacity (TLC) from chest radiographs, when applied to patients with clinical lung disease receiving routine chest radiographs.
Retrospective clinical survey.
An occupational medicine diagnostic clinic.
A convenience sample of 40 subjects with asbestos-related lung disease, 5 patients with nonasbestos-related restrictive defects, 15 subjects with occupational asthma, and 10 subjects with irritant tracheobronchitis.
Estimation of TLC using state-of-the-art computerized algorithms demonstrated limited agreement with conventional measures of TLC when applied to patients with occupational lung disease receiving routine chest radiographs. The most pronounced differences occurred in patients with asbestos-related lung disease and restrictive defects, where the radiographic method of measurement significantly overestimated helium dilution TLC by 986 mL (r=0.73, p<0.001) and 1,135 mL (r=0.82, p<0.05), respectively. Good inspiratory effort was associated with significantly increased radiographic TLC relative to helium dilution TLC; however, radiographic features did not fully account for the observed differences between radiographic and helium dilution techniques.
Our findings suggest that this planimetric technique should not be used as a substitute for conventional measures of TLC in clinic populations receiving routine radiographs. The large diagnostic group specific mean differences observed between radiographic and conventional measures of TLC also suggest that this method is of limited utility in clinical evaluation of occupational lung disease.
评估一种先进的计算机平面测量技术在应用于接受常规胸部X线检查的临床肺部疾病患者时,从胸部X线片估计肺总量(TLC)的有效性。
回顾性临床调查。
职业医学诊断诊所。
选取40例石棉相关肺病患者、5例非石棉相关限制性缺陷患者、15例职业性哮喘患者和10例刺激性气管支气管炎患者作为便利样本。
当将先进的计算机算法用于估计接受常规胸部X线检查的职业性肺病患者的TLC时,与TLC的传统测量方法相比,显示出的一致性有限。最显著的差异出现在石棉相关肺病和限制性缺陷患者中,其中放射学测量方法分别显著高估氦稀释法TLC 986 mL(r = 0.73,p < 0.001)和1135 mL(r = 0.82,p < 0.05)。良好的吸气努力与相对于氦稀释法TLC的放射学TLC显著增加相关;然而,放射学特征并未完全解释放射学和氦稀释技术之间观察到的差异。
我们的研究结果表明,在接受常规X线检查的临床人群中,这种平面测量技术不应替代TLC的传统测量方法。在放射学和TLC传统测量方法之间观察到的特定诊断组的大平均差异也表明,该方法在职业性肺病的临床评估中效用有限。