Tai C T, Chen S A, Chen Y J, Yu W C, Hsieh M H, Tsai C F, Chen C C, Ding Y A, Chang M S
Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998 Aug;9(8):811-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00120.x.
Previous mapping studies in patients with typical atrial flutter have demonstrated the crista terminalis to be a posterior barrier of the reentrant circuit forming a line of block. However, the functional role of the crista terminalis in patients with or without a history of atrial flutter is not well known. The aim of this study was to determine whether the conduction properties of the crista terminalis are different between patients with and those without a history of atrial flutter.
The study population consisted of 12 patients with clinically documented atrial flutter (group 1) and 12 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia as well as induced atrial flutter (group 2). A 7-French, 20-pole, deflectable Halo catheter was positioned around the tricuspid annulus. A 7-French, 20-pole Crista catheter was placed along the crista terminalis identified by the recording of double potentials with opposite activation sequences during typical atrial flutter. After sinus rhythm was restored, pacing from the low posterior right atrium near the crista terminalis was performed at multiple cycle length to 2:1 atrial capture. No double potentials were recorded along the crista terminalis during sinus rhythm in both groups. In group 1, the longest pacing cycle length that resulted in a line of block with double potentials along the crista terminalis was 638 +/- 119 msec. After infusion of propranolol, it was prolonged to 832 +/- 93 msec without change of the interdeflection intervals of double potentials. In group 2, the longest pacing cycle length that resulted in a line of block with double potentials along the crista terminalis was 214 +/- 23 msec. After infusion of procainamide, it was prolonged to 306 +/- 36 msec with increase of interdeflection interval of double potentials.
The crista terminalis forms a line of transverse conduction block during typical atrial flutter. Poor transverse conduction property in the crista terminalis may be the requisite substrate for clinical occurrence of typical atrial flutter.
先前对典型心房扑动患者的标测研究表明,界嵴是折返环的后向屏障,形成一条阻滞线。然而,界嵴在有或无心房扑动病史患者中的功能作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定有和无心房扑动病史的患者之间界嵴的传导特性是否不同。
研究人群包括12例有临床记录的心房扑动患者(第1组)和12例阵发性室上性心动过速以及诱发性心房扑动患者(第2组)。将一根7F、20极、可弯曲的Halo导管置于三尖瓣环周围。沿着界嵴放置一根7F、20极的界嵴导管,界嵴通过典型心房扑动期间记录到的具有相反激动顺序的双电位来确定。恢复窦性心律后,在靠近界嵴的右房后下部以多个周长进行起搏,直至2:1心房夺获。两组在窦性心律期间沿界嵴均未记录到双电位。在第1组中,导致界嵴出现双电位阻滞线的最长起搏周长为638±119毫秒。静脉注射普萘洛尔后,该周长延长至832±93毫秒,双电位的偏转间期无变化。在第2组中,导致界嵴出现双电位阻滞线的最长起搏周长为214±23毫秒。静脉注射普鲁卡因胺后,该周长延长至306±36毫秒,双电位的偏转间期增加。
在典型心房扑动期间,界嵴形成一条横向传导阻滞线。界嵴横向传导性能较差可能是典型心房扑动临床发生的必要基质。