Suppr超能文献

用低剂量康维特疫苗对麻风菌素阴性的界线类麻风患者进行免疫治疗作为多药联合治疗的辅助手段:在加尔各答进行的一项为期六年的随访研究。

Immunotherapy of lepromin-negative borderline leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine as an adjunct to multidrug therapy; a six-year follow-up study in Calcutta.

作者信息

Chaudhury S, Hajra S K, Mukerjee A, Saha B, Majumdar V, Chattapadhya D, Saha K

机构信息

School of Tropical Medicine, Calcutta, India.

出版信息

Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1997 Mar;65(1):56-62.

PMID:9207754
Abstract

The present report, which describes management of lepromin-negative borderline leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine, is an extension of our earlier study on the treatment of lepromatous leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine as an adjunct to multidrug therapy (MDT). The test Group I, consisting of 50 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients, were given low-dose Convit vaccine plus MDT. The control group II consisted of 25 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients given BCG vaccination plus MDT and 25 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients given killed Mycobacterium leprae (human) vaccine plus MDT. The control group III consisted of 50 lepromin-positive, borderline leprosy patients not given any immunostimulation but given only MDT. Depending upon the lepromin unresponsiveness, the patients were given one to four inoculations of the various antileprosy vaccines and were followed up every 3 months for 2 years for clinical, bacteriological and immunological outcome. All patients belonging to the test and control groups showed clinical cure and bacteriological negativity within 2 years. However, immunologic potentiation, assessed by lepromin testing and the leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT), was better in the test patients receiving low-dose Convit vaccine plus MDT than in the control patients receiving BCG vaccine plus MDT or killed M. leprae vaccine plus MDT or MDT alone. But the capacity of clearance bacteria (CCB) test from the lepromin granuloma showed poor bacterial clearance in the test patients. However, there was no relapse during 6 years of follow up. Two mid-borderline (BB) patients had severe reversal reactions with lagophthalmos and wrist drop during immunotherapy despite being given low-dose Convit vaccine.

摘要

本报告描述了用低剂量康维特疫苗治疗麻风菌素阴性的界线类麻风患者的情况,它是我们早期关于用低剂量康维特疫苗作为多药联合治疗(MDT)辅助手段治疗瘤型麻风患者研究的扩展。试验组I由50例麻风菌素阴性的界线类麻风患者组成,给予低剂量康维特疫苗加MDT。对照组II由25例给予卡介苗接种加MDT的麻风菌素阴性的界线类麻风患者和25例给予灭活麻风杆菌(人)疫苗加MDT的麻风菌素阴性的界线类麻风患者组成。对照组III由50例未接受任何免疫刺激仅接受MDT的麻风菌素阳性的界线类麻风患者组成。根据麻风菌素无反应情况,给予患者1至4次不同抗麻风疫苗接种,并每3个月随访1次,持续2年,观察临床、细菌学和免疫学结果。试验组和对照组的所有患者在2年内均显示临床治愈且细菌学转阴。然而,通过麻风菌素试验和白细胞游走抑制试验(LMIT)评估,接受低剂量康维特疫苗加MDT的试验组患者的免疫增强情况优于接受卡介苗加MDT或灭活麻风杆菌疫苗加MDT或仅接受MDT的对照组患者。但从麻风菌素肉芽肿进行的清除细菌能力(CCB)试验显示,试验组患者的细菌清除情况较差。不过,在6年的随访期间没有复发。尽管给予了低剂量康维特疫苗,但有2例中间界线类(BB)患者在免疫治疗期间出现了严重的逆向反应,伴有兔眼和垂腕。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验