Combined cisplatin and gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer: influence of scheduling on toxicity and drug delivery.

The scheduling of cytotoxic chemotherapy has important bearing on the toxicity and ability to deliver chemotherapy at or close to full dose. We report new data on the influence of different schedules of cisplatin and gemcitabine on toxicity and drug delivery in phase II studies of non-small cell lung cancer. Patients in six phase II studies had standard entry criteria for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Whereas gemcitabine was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle in all these studies, the scheduling of cisplatin varied and was given either on day 1, day 2, day 15 (in two studies), or days 1, 8, and 15 (in two studies). The protocol dose per infusion for gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m2 (five studies) and 1,500 mg/m2 (one study); for cisplatin, it was 100 mg/m2 when given once per cycle and 30 mg/m2 when given on days 1, 8, and 15. Similar dose reduction schedules were implemented in the event of grade 3 or higher drug toxicity for all studies except for the day 1 cisplatin study, in which the dose was omitted for grade 2 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was very low. Hematologic toxicity was moderate, and in patients who developed grade 3 or 4 toxicity, there was no hemorrhage from thrombocytopenia and neutropenic sepsis was rare. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia with the day 1, day 2, day 15 (two studies combined), and days 1, 8, and 15 (two studies combined) cisplatin regimens was 50%, 52%, 26%, and 38%. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia with these four regimens was 51%, 37%, 56%, and 49%, respectively. Although the hematologic toxicity might appear relatively similar, it represents the toxicity at the administered rather than the intended (protocol) dose, because drug delivery was reduced or omitted in the event of grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Differences between the schedules are revealed by analysis of the actual dosages delivered. The median dosage of gemcitabine per scheduled infusion was statistically higher with the day 15 cisplatin regimens (combined) compared with any of the other regimens treating at 1,000 mg/m2 (P < .003, z-score). The dose with the day 1, day 2, day 15, and days 1, 8, and 15 cisplatin regimens was 664, 829, 889, and 774 mg/m2, respectively. Both the percentages of cycles in which gemcitabine infusions were given at full dose and in which there were no omissions of gemcitabine infusions (including infusions with dose reductions) were statistically higher in the day 15 cisplatin regimen than with any of the other regimens (P < .0001, chi-square test). The percentage of cycles containing full-dose gemcitabine with the day 1, day 2, day 15, and days 1, 8, and 15 cisplatin regimens was 24%, 44%, 75%, and 46%, respectively. The percentage of cycles in which there were no omissions of gemcitabine infusions for the four regimens above was 32%, 55%, 83%, and 72%, respectively. Apart from the once-weekly regimen (days 1, 8, and 15) in which the protocol gemcitabine dose was 1,250 mg/m2, the day 15 cisplatin schedule allowed for the highest median concentration of gemcitabine. More importantly, the day 15 cisplatin schedule provided the longest duration of gemcitabine exposure, which is particularly important for its activity as gemcitabine is a phase-specific agent. The day 15 cisplatin schedule is associated with the best dose intensity and the longest median duration of exposure to gemcitabine, and best meets the goal of administering both agents at full doses in combination.