Dollins A B, Cestaro V L, Pettit D J
Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, Fort McClellan, AL, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 1998 Sep;43(5):1016-23.
Physiological measures were recorded during repeated psychophysiological detection of deception (PDD) tests to determine if reaction levels change with test repetition. Two groups of 22 healthy male subjects completed six peak of tension PDD tests on each of two test days. A minimum between test day interval of six days was maintained. The treatment group was programmed to respond deceptively to one of seven test questions while the control group was programmed to respond truthfully to all questions. The respiration and galvanic skin resistance (GSR) line lengths, GSR peak response amplitude and latency, and cardiovascular inter-beat-interval (IBI) were calculated for each response. Analyses indicated that, except for GSR peak response latency, differential physiological reactivity during a PDD test did not change significantly over repeated tests or days; there was a decrease in average respiration line lengths at the initial test(s) of each day; and differential changes in average respiration line length, GSR peak latency, and cardiovascular IBI responses corresponded to deception. Power analyses were calculated to assist in result interpretation. It is suggested that PDD decision accuracy, concerning subject veracity, should not decrease during repeated testing.
在重复的心理生理测谎(PDD)测试过程中记录生理指标,以确定反应水平是否随测试重复而变化。两组各22名健康男性受试者在两个测试日中的每一天都完成了六次紧张峰值PDD测试。两个测试日之间的间隔至少保持六天。治疗组被设定为对七个测试问题中的一个做出欺骗性回答,而对照组被设定为对所有问题都如实回答。计算每次反应的呼吸和皮肤电反应(GSR)线长度、GSR峰值反应幅度和潜伏期以及心血管心动间期(IBI)。分析表明,除了GSR峰值反应潜伏期外,PDD测试期间的差异生理反应在重复测试或不同日期之间没有显著变化;每天最初的测试中平均呼吸线长度有所下降;平均呼吸线长度、GSR峰值潜伏期和心血管IBI反应的差异变化与欺骗行为相对应。计算了功效分析以辅助结果解释。建议在重复测试期间,关于受试者诚实度的PDD决策准确性不应降低。