• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两项临终关怀生活质量调查:比较

Two hospice quality of life surveys: a comparison.

作者信息

Eischens M J, Elliott B A, Elliott T E

机构信息

University of Minnesota-Duluth, School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1998 May-Jun;15(3):143-8. doi: 10.1177/104990919801500308.

DOI:10.1177/104990919801500308
PMID:9729959
Abstract

This study's objective tested the utility of two quality of life (QOL) forms in a hospice setting. The compared forms were the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL) and the Hospice Quality of Life Index-Revised (HQLI). Using a crossover design, hospice nurses first administered one survey to eligible patients and then, in the study's second phase, administered the other survey to newly enrolled eligible patients. Nurses were interviewed regarding each form and possible changes in patient care that were made due to the assessment. Hospice care plans were reviewed looking for specific changes as a result of the surveys. The results showed that the QOL assessments were useful for the nurses in planning the care of the hospice patients and that the MQOL was preferred by the nurses over the HQLI.

摘要

本研究的目的是测试两种生活质量(QOL)量表在临终关怀环境中的效用。所比较的量表为麦吉尔生活质量问卷(MQOL)和修订版临终关怀生活质量指数(HQLI)。采用交叉设计,临终关怀护士首先向符合条件的患者发放一份调查问卷,然后在研究的第二阶段,向新纳入的符合条件的患者发放另一份调查问卷。就每份量表以及因评估而可能在患者护理方面做出的改变对护士进行了访谈。审查临终关怀护理计划,以查找因调查而产生的具体变化。结果表明,生活质量评估对护士规划临终关怀患者的护理很有用,并且护士更喜欢MQOL而非HQLI。

相似文献

1
Two hospice quality of life surveys: a comparison.两项临终关怀生活质量调查:比较
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1998 May-Jun;15(3):143-8. doi: 10.1177/104990919801500308.
2
Use of quality-of-life scores in care planning in a hospice setting: the theme of revelation.临终关怀环境下生活质量评分在护理计划中的应用:启示主题
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2002 Dec;8(12):591-3. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2002.8.12.10976.
3
Quality of life in cancer patients: use of a revised Hospice Index.癌症患者的生活质量:修订版临终关怀指数的应用。
Cancer Pract. 1998 Sep-Oct;6(5):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.00023.x.
4
The quality of life of patients with cancer receiving hospice care.接受临终关怀的癌症患者的生活质量。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 Sep;23(8):1221-8.
5
Cross-cultural validation of the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese.《麦吉尔生活质量问卷在香港华人中的跨文化效度验证》
Palliat Med. 2001 Sep;15(5):387-97. doi: 10.1191/026921601680419438.
6
Pain and pain relief experienced by hospice patients with cancer.临终关怀癌症患者所经历的疼痛及疼痛缓解情况。
Cancer Nurs. 1996 Aug;19(4):298-307. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199608000-00006.
7
The impact of hospice services on the quality of life of primary caregivers.临终关怀服务对主要照顾者生活质量的影响。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Aug;21(7):1189-95.
8
Hospice Attitudes of Physicians and Nurses: A Pilot Study.医生和护士对临终关怀的态度:一项试点研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Feb;33(1):34-40. doi: 10.1177/1049909114552124. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
9
Nurses' communication of prognosis and implications for hospice referral: a study of nurses caring for terminally ill hospitalized patients.护士对预后的沟通及临终关怀转诊的影响:一项针对照料住院绝症患者的护士的研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2005 Jan;14(1):64-70.
10
The study on evaluation and improvement of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer by China's hospice program.中国临终关怀项目对晚期癌症患者生活质量的评估与改善研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015 Jun;32(4):365-71. doi: 10.1177/1049909114523331. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis.患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)如何支持临床医生与患者之间的沟通及患者护理?一项实在论综合分析。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 15;2:42. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0061-6. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Design and introduction of a quality of life assessment and practice support system: perspectives from palliative care settings.姑息治疗环境下生活质量评估与实践支持系统的设计与引入:观点阐述
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Aug 22;2:36. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0065-2. eCollection 2017.