Irrgang J J, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner R S, Fu F H, Harner C D
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Aug;80(8):1132-45. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199808000-00006.
The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Activities of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Survey, a patient-reported measure of functional limitations imposed by pathological disorders and impairments of the knee during activities of daily living. The study comprised 397 patients; 213 were male, 156 were female, and the gender was not recorded for the remaining twenty-eight. The mean age of the patients was 33.3 years (range, twelve to seventy-six years). The patients were referred to physical therapy because of a wide variety of disorders of the knee, including ligamentous and meniscal injuries, patellofemoral pain, and osteoarthrosis. The Activities of Daily Living Scale was administered four times during an eight-week period: at the time of the initial evaluation and after one, four, and eight weeks of therapy. Concurrent measures of function included the Lysholm Knee Scale and several global measures of function. The subjects also provided an assessment of the change in function, with responses ranging from greatly worse to greatly better, at one, four, and eight weeks. The Activities of Daily Living Scale was administered to an additional sample of fifty-two patients (thirty-two male and twenty female patients with a mean age of 31.6 years [range, fourteen to sixty-six years]) before and after treatment within a single day to establish test-retest reliability. Factor analysis revealed two dominant factors: one that reflected a combination of symptoms and functional limitations and the other, only symptoms. The internal consistency of the Activities of Daily Living Scale was substantially higher than that of the Lysholm Knee Scale (coefficient alpha, 0.92 to 0.93 compared with 0.60 to 0.73), resulting in a smaller standard error of measurement for the former scale. Validity was demonstrated by moderately strong correlations with concurrent measures of function, including the Lysholm Knee Scale (r = 0.78 to 0.86) and the global assessment of function as measured on a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points (r = 0.66 to 0.75). Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed significant improvements in the score on the Activities of Daily Living Scale during the eight weeks of physical therapy (F2,236 = 108.13; p < 0.0001); post hoc testing indicated that the change in the score at eight weeks was significantly greater than the change at four weeks and that the change at four weeks was significantly greater than that at one week (p < 0.0001 for both). As had been hypothesized, the patients in whom the knee had somewhat improved had a significantly smaller change in the score, both at four weeks (F1,189 = 33.50; p < 0.001) and at eight weeks (F1,156 = 22.48; p < 0.001), compared with those in whom the knee had greatly improved. The test-retest reliability coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient[2,1]) was 0.97. These results suggest that the Activities of Daily Living Scale is a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for the assessment of functional limitations that result from a wide variety of pathological disorders and impairments of the knee.
本研究的目的是证明膝关节结果调查日常生活活动量表的可靠性、有效性和反应性,该量表是一种由患者报告的、用于衡量日常生活活动中膝关节病理紊乱和损伤所导致的功能受限情况的测量工具。该研究纳入了397例患者;其中男性213例,女性156例,其余28例未记录性别。患者的平均年龄为33.3岁(范围为12至76岁)。患者因多种膝关节疾病,包括韧带和半月板损伤、髌股疼痛和骨关节炎,而被转介接受物理治疗。日常生活活动量表在为期8周的时间内进行了4次评估:在初始评估时以及治疗1周、4周和8周后。功能的同期测量指标包括Lysholm膝关节量表和几项整体功能测量指标。受试者还对1周、4周和8周时的功能变化进行了评估,回答范围从明显变差到明显变好。在同一天对另外52例患者(32例男性和20例女性患者,平均年龄31.6岁[范围为14至66岁])在治疗前后进行日常生活活动量表评估,以确定重测信度。因子分析揭示了两个主要因子:一个反映症状和功能受限的组合,另一个仅反映症状。日常生活活动量表的内部一致性显著高于Lysholm膝关节量表(α系数,分别为0.92至0.93和0.60至0.73),导致前者的测量标准误更小。通过与功能的同期测量指标(包括Lysholm膝关节量表[r = 0.78至0.86])以及0至100分的整体功能评估[r = 0.66至0.75])的中度强相关性,证明了该量表的有效性。重复测量方差分析显示,在为期8周的物理治疗期间,日常生活活动量表的得分有显著改善(F2,236 = 108.13;p < 0.0001);事后检验表明,8周时得分的变化显著大于4周时的变化,4周时得分的变化显著大于1周时的变化(两者p均< 0.0001)。正如所假设的,与膝关节改善较大的患者相比,膝关节有所改善的患者在4周(F1,189 = 33.50;p < 0.001)和8周(F1,156 = 22.48;p < 0.001)时得分的变化显著更小。重测信度系数(组内相关系数[2,1])为0.97。这些结果表明,日常生活活动量表是一种可靠、有效且具有反应性的工具,可用于评估由多种膝关节病理紊乱和损伤导致的功能受限情况。