Glass N, Davis K
School of Nursing and Health Care Practices, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1998 Sep;21(1):43-52. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199809000-00005.
This article critiques the current debates regarding feminism, postmodernism, and feminist/postmodernism within nursing research. The critique classified the debates into three identifiable constructs: dissatisfaction, fragmentation, and integration. The authors propose a solution from the integration debate as an emancipatory "workable" turning point for nursing research. The solution is situated within feminism and draws on the epistemological constructs of both modernism and postmodernism. Nursing research is framed within the proposed ontological links that characterize the integrated solution.
本文对护理研究中有关女权主义、后现代主义以及女权主义/后现代主义的当前争论进行了批判。该批判将这些争论归为三个可识别的结构：不满、碎片化和整合。作者们从整合争论中提出了一个解决方案，作为护理研究的一个解放性的“可行”转折点。该解决方案处于女权主义范畴内，并借鉴了现代主义和后现代主义的认识论结构。护理研究被置于所提出的、表征整合解决方案的本体论联系之中。
