Suppr超能文献

在手动轮椅推进过程中,有经验者与无经验者之间的选定比较。

Selected comparisons between experienced and non-experienced individuals during manual wheelchair propulsion.

作者信息

Patterson P, Draper S

机构信息

Iowa State University, College of Engineering, Ames 50011, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Sci Instrum. 1997;33:477-81.

PMID:9731406
Abstract

The present study was undertaken to identify potential errors that might arise from combining able-bodied individuals with wheelchair dependent individuals to form larger sample sizes when studying manual wheelchair propulsion. Five able-bodied and five wheelchair dependent individuals, ranging in age from 24 to 36, propelled a wheelchair on a dynamometer at three different velocities. Of the nine variables (at three different velocities) investigated, significant differences (p < 0.05) were obtained for three physiological characteristics: propulsion efficiency, peak oxygen consumption, and energy input all at high velocity, and for four technique characteristics: at low velocity (propulsion time), and at high velocity (propulsion time, push angle, work per stroke). The results suggest that able-bodied individuals should not be used to increase the size of subject pools when doing studies which include these variables.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在研究手动轮椅推进时,将健全个体与依赖轮椅的个体组合以形成更大样本量可能产生的潜在误差。五名健全个体和五名依赖轮椅的个体,年龄在24至36岁之间,在测力计上以三种不同速度推动轮椅。在所研究的九个变量(在三种不同速度下)中,在高速时,三种生理特征(推进效率、峰值耗氧量和能量输入)以及四种技术特征(低速时的推进时间,高速时的推进时间、推角、每冲程功)存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。结果表明,在进行包含这些变量的研究时,不应使用健全个体来增加受试群体的规模。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验