Huuskonen S E, Hahn M E, Lindström-Seppä P
University of Kuopio, Department of Physiology, Finland.
Chemosphere. 1998 Jun;36(14):2921-32. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(97)10248-x.
Cytotoxicity and CYP1A induction properties of celluloses and wood chips were studied with a teleost liver cell line, PLHC-1. Cells were exposed to acetone extracts of celluloses produced using new bleaching techniques (elemental chlorine free, ECF; totally chlorine free, TCF) in two sulphate mills or without any bleaching (unbleached, UB) in a sulphite mill. In another set of exposures, celluloses (ECF and TCF bleached) and wood chips (from pine and birch) were collected from a sulphate mill, extracted with acetone, and the extracts used to treat the cells. After exposure, O-deethylation of 7-ethoxyresorufin (EROD, a measure of cytochrome P4501A (CYP1A) catalytic activity), and total protein content, a measure of cytotoxicity, were assayed. The presence of the CYP1A protein in the exposed cells was assessed by immunoblotting. The cellulose and wood chip extracts were able to cause both cytotoxicity and EROD induction in the PLHC-1 cells. In the exposures conducted with the material from three different mills, the celluloses made of birch were more cytotoxic and more potent inducers of EROD activity than were the celluloses of pine. Further, UB celluloses increased EROD activity and caused cytotoxicity at lower doses than material bleached with modern bleaching techniques. In the exposures made with material from one single mill, there were no clear trends between the celluloses made of pine or birch. Wood chips of pine, however, were more cytotoxic than wood chips of birch. Especially with pine wood chips, cytotoxicity interfered with the induction of EROD activity, thus complicating the evaluation of CYP1A induction. CYP1A protein content was not detected in cells exposed to extracts of celluloses or wood chips, possibly due to low amounts of protein available for the assay. Wood and pulp processing, like bleaching, may change the chemical composition of the raw material in a way that reduces the potency for biological effects of the final product, cellulose. This could explain why both UB celluloses and wood chips were more potent in the cells than ECF or TCF bleached celluloses. In this study the PLHC-1 cell line showed its potential for use in evaluating the biological activity existing in pulp and paper mill products and raw materials. The identity and source of the compounds that were able to affect the PLHC-1 cell line remain to be determined.
利用一种硬骨鱼肝细胞系PLHC-1研究了纤维素和木片的细胞毒性及CYP1A诱导特性。将细胞暴露于两家硫酸盐厂采用新漂白技术(无元素氯,ECF;全无氯,TCF)生产的纤维素或一家亚硫酸盐厂未进行任何漂白(未漂白,UB)的纤维素的丙酮提取物中。在另一组暴露实验中,从一家硫酸盐厂收集纤维素(ECF和TCF漂白)和木片(来自松树和桦树),用丙酮提取,提取物用于处理细胞。暴露后,检测7-乙氧基异吩恶唑酮的O-脱乙基作用(EROD,细胞色素P4501A(CYP1A)催化活性的一种度量)以及总蛋白含量(细胞毒性的一种度量)。通过免疫印迹法评估暴露细胞中CYP1A蛋白的存在情况。纤维素和木片提取物能够在PLHC-1细胞中引起细胞毒性和EROD诱导。在用来自三家不同工厂的材料进行的暴露实验中,桦木制成的纤维素比松木制成的纤维素具有更强的细胞毒性和更强的EROD活性诱导能力。此外,未漂白纤维素比用现代漂白技术漂白的材料在更低剂量下就能增加EROD活性并引起细胞毒性。在用来自一家工厂的材料进行的暴露实验中,松木或桦木制成的纤维素之间没有明显趋势。然而,松木片比桦木片具有更强的细胞毒性。特别是对于松木片,细胞毒性干扰了EROD活性的诱导,从而使CYP1A诱导的评估变得复杂。在暴露于纤维素或木片提取物的细胞中未检测到CYP1A蛋白含量,这可能是由于可用于检测的蛋白量较少。木材和纸浆加工,如漂白,可能会改变原材料的化学成分,从而降低最终产品纤维素的生物效应效力。这可以解释为什么未漂白纤维素和木片在细胞中的效力比ECF或TCF漂白纤维素更强。在本研究中,PLHC-1细胞系显示出其在评估纸浆和造纸厂产品及原材料中存在的生物活性方面的潜力。能够影响PLHC-1细胞系的化合物的身份和来源仍有待确定。