Gaebe R J, Sanson D W, Rush I G, Riley M L, Hixon D L, Paisley S I
Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071-3684, USA.
J Anim Sci. 1998 Aug;76(8):2001-7. doi: 10.2527/1998.7682001x.
We conducted two trials to evaluate the effects of extruding vs dry-rolling either corn or grain sorghum on intake, digestibility, and performance of finishing steers. In Trial 1, 92 crossbred steers (average BW 413 kg) were used in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Diets contained either dry-rolled corn (RC), extruded corn (EC), dry-rolled grain sorghum (RGS), or extruded grain sorghum (EGS). Diets were fed for 110 d and contained 78.6% of the respective grain, 9% alfalfa pellets, 8.2% molasses, and 4.2% protein-mineral supplement. Daily gain was highest (P < .049) for steers fed RC, and the ADG of steers fed RGS was higher than that of steers fed extruded diets; there was no difference in ADG between steers fed EC and those fed EGS. Steers fed dry-rolled diets consumed more DM (P = .001) than steers fed extruded diets. Feed efficiency was not affected (P = .18) by processing method, but steers fed corn utilized the diets more efficiently (P = .006) than steers fed grain sorghum. Except for carcass weight, carcass data were not affected by grain type (P > .20). Dressing percentage, quality grade, and longissimus muscle area were lower (P < .09) in steers that received extruded grain than in those that received dry-rolled grain. In Trial 2, five ruminally cannulated crossbred steers (average BW 518 kg) were used in a 4 x 4 + 1 Latin square design to evaluate the ruminal and total tract digestion characteristics of the diets used in Trial 1. Type of grain had no effect (P > .16) on intake, total tract digestibility, or ruminal pH. Extruding corn or grain sorghum decreased intake (P < .001) but increased (P < .074) DM and starch digestibility compared with dry rolling; steers fed extruded diets had lower (P < .032) ADF and NDF digestibilities. Ruminal in situ DM and starch disappearance were higher (P < .03) and ruminal pH was lower (P < .052) in steers fed extruded grains than in those fed dry-rolled grains. Data from this study indicate that extruded corn and extruded grain sorghum are highly degradable feeds; however, decreased DM intake and lower ruminal pH levels resulted in lower performance.
我们进行了两项试验,以评估挤压处理与干碾压处理的玉米或高粱对育肥牛的采食量、消化率和生产性能的影响。在试验1中,92头杂交育肥牛(平均体重413千克)采用2×2析因设计。日粮分别包含干碾压玉米(RC)、挤压玉米(EC)、干碾压高粱(RGS)或挤压高粱(EGS)。日粮饲喂110天,分别包含78.6%的相应谷物、9%的苜蓿颗粒、8.2%的糖蜜和4.2%的蛋白质矿物质补充剂。饲喂RC的育肥牛日增重最高(P < 0.049),饲喂RGS的育肥牛的平均日增重高于饲喂挤压日粮的育肥牛;饲喂EC和EGS的育肥牛的平均日增重无差异。饲喂干碾压日粮的育肥牛比饲喂挤压日粮的育肥牛消耗更多的干物质(P = 0.001)。加工方法对饲料效率没有影响(P = 0.18),但饲喂玉米的育肥牛比饲喂高粱的育肥牛更有效地利用日粮(P = 0.006)。除胴体重外,胴体数据不受谷物类型的影响(P > 0.20)。与饲喂干碾压谷物的育肥牛相比,饲喂挤压谷物的育肥牛的屠宰率、质量等级和背最长肌面积较低(P < 0.09)。在试验2中,五头装有瘤胃瘘管的杂交育肥牛(平均体重518千克)采用4×4 + 1拉丁方设计,以评估试验1中使用的日粮的瘤胃和全消化道消化特性。谷物类型对采食量、全消化道消化率或瘤胃pH值没有影响(P > 0.16)。与干碾压相比,挤压玉米或高粱降低了采食量(P < 0.001),但提高了干物质和淀粉消化率(P < 0.074);饲喂挤压日粮的育肥牛的酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维消化率较低(P < 0.032)。与饲喂干碾压谷物的育肥牛相比,饲喂挤压谷物的育肥牛的瘤胃原位干物质和淀粉消失率更高(P < 0.03),瘤胃pH值更低(P < 0.052)。本研究数据表明,挤压玉米和挤压高粱是高度可降解的饲料;然而,干物质采食量降低和瘤胃pH值较低导致生产性能下降。