Suppr超能文献

用于模态接口的医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)与卫生信息交换标准(HL7)对比

DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing.

作者信息

Oosterwijk H

机构信息

OTech Inc, Plano TX, USA.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 1998 Aug;11(3 Suppl 1):39-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03168256.

Abstract

Digital modalities such as CT, MRI, Ultrasound and Computerized Radiography systems, generating softcopy images to be used by a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), need to identify the images properly in order to retrieve and manage them. In many cases, a technologist re-enters patient demographic and study related information at the modality, even although it is usually already present somewhere in the hospital information system (IS). In order to achieve a higher level of efficiency and uniquely identify the created image objects, it is obvious that an interface between the IS and modality to exchange this information is highly desired. There are two options for a modality vendor to implement an IS interface, either using the Health Level (HL7) or Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine (DICOM) communication standard. This paper will explain characteristics of both protocols, and demonstrate that it is preferred to use DICOM versus HL7. In addition, it will show that DICOM is supported by most modality vendors, based on the result of a poll of their Modality Worklist versus HL7 support.

摘要

诸如CT、MRI、超声和计算机放射成像系统等数字模态会生成供图像存档与通信系统(PACS)使用的软拷贝图像,为了检索和管理这些图像,需要对其进行正确识别。在许多情况下,即使医院信息系统(IS)中通常已经存在患者人口统计学和检查相关信息,技术人员仍需在模态设备处重新输入这些信息。为了实现更高的效率并唯一标识所创建的图像对象,显然非常需要IS与模态设备之间有一个用于交换此信息的接口。模态设备供应商实现IS接口有两种选择,即使用健康级别(HL7)或医学数字成像通信(DICOM)通信标准。本文将解释这两种协议的特点,并证明与HL7相比,使用DICOM更可取。此外,根据对模态设备供应商的模态工作列表与HL7支持情况的调查结果,将表明大多数模态设备供应商都支持DICOM。

相似文献

3
5
Specifying DICOM compliance for modality interfaces.指定模态接口的DICOM合规性。
Radiographics. 1993 Nov;13(6):1381-8. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.13.6.8290731.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验