Anyanwu A C, Moalypour S M
Accident and Emergency Department, Kingston Hospital, Kingston-Upon-Thames, UK.
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998 Aug;43(4):267-70.
Several studies have shown that plain film radiography (PFR) is unnecessary for most patients with abdominal pain. To evaluate the current-day utilization of PFR, we retrospectively reviewed 224 patients presenting to an emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Plain film radiography was performed in 55.8% (125/224) of patients, but only 10.4% (13/125) of these were diagnostic. Most patients with non-specific abdominal pain had radiographs (62%, 31/50), suggesting that PFR was being used as a routine investigation. Plain film radiography has little in the diagnosis of most causes of abdominal pain and should therefore not be used routinely. Confining radiography to patients with suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation or ischaemia, unexplained peritonism, or renal colic would have included all our diagnostic films and reduced the utilization of PFR to 20.5%. The reasons for inappropriate requests and issues concerning the use of emergency radiography are discussed. Staff education, departmental protocols and increased out-of-hours ultrasonography facilities are recommended to reduce the inappropriate use of PFR.
多项研究表明,对于大多数腹痛患者而言,普通X线平片(PFR)检查并无必要。为评估当前PFR的使用情况,我们回顾性分析了224例因急性腹痛就诊于急诊科的患者。55.8%(125/224)的患者接受了普通X线平片检查,但其中仅10.4%(13/125)的检查结果具有诊断价值。大多数非特异性腹痛患者都进行了X线检查(62%,31/50),这表明PFR被用作常规检查手段。普通X线平片对大多数腹痛病因的诊断价值不大,因此不应常规使用。将X线检查局限于疑似胃肠道梗阻、穿孔或缺血、不明原因的腹膜炎或肾绞痛患者,本可涵盖所有具有诊断意义的检查,并将PFR的使用率降至20.5%。本文讨论了不恰当申请的原因以及急诊X线检查使用方面的问题。建议通过员工教育、部门协议以及增加非工作时间超声检查设备来减少PFR的不当使用。