The effect of different diagnostic thresholds on incidence of disease progression.

Detection of periodontal disease progression occurs when a predetermined threshold of attachment loss is exceeded during longitudinal monitoring. The incidence of disease progression in a population may be dependent on the method and threshold utilized to identify significant changes in attachment level measurements. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of utilizing different methods and thresholds on the incidence of disease progression in an untreated periodontitis population. The relationship between baseline clinical parameters and disease progression was also examined. A total of 411 interproximal sites in 46 individuals were monitored monthly over a 6-month period. Disease progression was determined by the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method and by the absolute change in relative attachment level between months 0 and 6 utilizing 3 different thresholds for attachment level change (0.58 mm, 1.16 mm, and 1.74 mm) based upon examiner repeatability using an automated probe. Utilizing the CUSUM method, 49 of 411 sites (11.9%) demonstrated attachment loss over the 6-month observation period. When attachment level changes > or = 0.58 mm, > or = 1.16 mm, and > or = 1.74 mm were used to identify disease progression, the percentage of sites exhibiting deterioration were 19.5%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively. These results demonstrate that the apparent incidence of disease progression was dependent on the method and threshold utilized to detect progressive sites. When utilizing the CUSUM and 0.58 mm thresholds a significant (P < 0.05), but weak relationship (r = -0.26) was observed between baseline relative attachment level measurements and sites exhibiting disease progression. This finding suggests that sites with significant but relatively less attachment loss may be more likely to experience further breakdown compared to sites with a history of greater periodontal destruction.