Suppr超能文献

患有已确诊牙周炎的受试者的牙周附着丧失率。

The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.

作者信息

Machtei E E, Norderyd J, Koch G, Dunford R, Grossi S, Genco R J

机构信息

Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1993 Aug;64(8):713-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.8.713.

Abstract

A stepwise approach to determine attachment level changes was utilized to assess the nature of progression of periodontal disease. Following initial screening, 51 subjects with established periodontitis were monitored quarterly for 9 more months. Probing depth (PD) and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded using an automated, pressure sensitive probe system. To establish intra-examiner error, repeated measurements were performed for all sites at the final visit. An overall standard deviation (SD) for RAL repeated measurements was initially calculated (0.76 mm) using all 6,935 double measurements. Sites were sorted by factors which contribute to the error of attachment level measurements; i.e., pocket depth (shallow, moderate, deep), tooth type (molar, non-molar) and location (buccal, lingual). Data were sorted by the above 12 groups, and SD for repeated measurements was calculated separately for them. The ratio between these SD and the overall SD served as the corrective factor. Each patient's initial threshold (2 SD) was multiplied by these corrective factors thus resulting in 12 thresholds for each subject. Next, linear, exponential and logarithmic regression models were tested for each site, and the regression model showing the highest R value was chosen for that site. AL changes were tested against the patient's threshold for that site. Sites with attachment loss exceeding the threshold were deemed active. Five hundred eighty-one sites (8.3%) exhibited attachment loss exceeding the various thresholds. Of these, linear progression occurred in 195, logarithmic in 224, and exponential in 162 sites. Individual patient's attachment loss ranged from 0.6 to 19.4% of all sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

采用逐步确定附着水平变化的方法来评估牙周病进展的性质。在初始筛查后,对51例已确诊为牙周炎的受试者进行了为期9个月的季度监测。使用自动压力敏感探针系统记录探诊深度(PD)和相对附着水平(RAL)。为确定检查者内误差,在最后一次就诊时对所有部位进行了重复测量。最初使用所有6935次双份测量计算了RAL重复测量的总体标准差(SD)(0.76mm)。根据导致附着水平测量误差的因素对部位进行分类;即牙周袋深度(浅、中、深)、牙齿类型(磨牙、非磨牙)和位置(颊侧、舌侧)。数据按上述12组进行分类,并分别计算每组重复测量的SD。这些SD与总体SD的比值作为校正因子。将每位患者的初始阈值(2SD)乘以这些校正因子,从而为每位受试者得出12个阈值。接下来,对每个部位测试线性、指数和对数回归模型,并为该部位选择显示最高R值的回归模型。将AL变化与该部位患者的阈值进行比较。附着丧失超过阈值的部位被视为活跃部位。581个部位(8.3%)的附着丧失超过了各种阈值。其中,195个部位呈线性进展,224个部位呈对数进展,162个部位呈指数进展。个体患者的附着丧失占所有部位的0.6%至19.4%。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验