Coull J T, Nobre A C
Functional Imaging Laboratory, Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7426-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07426.1998.
Although attention is distributed across time as well as space, the temporal allocation of attention has been less well researched than its spatial counterpart. A temporal analog of the covert spatial orientation task [Posner MI, Snyder CRR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160-174] was developed to compare the neural systems involved in directing attention to spatial locations versus time intervals. We asked whether there exists a general system for allocating attentional resources, independent of stimulus dimension, or whether functionally specialized brain regions are recruited for directing attention toward spatial versus temporal aspects of the environment. We measured brain activity in seven healthy volunteers by using positron emission tomography (PET) and in eight healthy volunteers by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The task manipulated cued attention to spatial locations (S) and temporal intervals (T) in a factorial design. Symbolic central cues oriented subjects toward S only (left or right), toward T only (300 msec or 1500 msec), toward both S and T simultaneously, or provided no information regarding S or T. Subjects also were scanned during a resting baseline condition. Behavioral data showed benefits and costs for performance during temporal attention similar to those established for spatial attention. Brain-imaging data revealed a partial overlap between neural systems involved in the performance of spatial versus temporal orientation of attention tasks. Additionally, hemispheric asymmetries revealed preferential right and left parietal activation for spatial and temporal attention, respectively. Parietal cortex was activated bilaterally by attending to both dimensions simultaneously. This is the first direct comparison of the neural correlates of attending to spatial versus temporal cues.
尽管注意力在时间和空间上都有分配,但与空间注意力相比,时间注意力的分配研究较少。我们开发了一种隐蔽空间定向任务[波斯纳MI、斯奈德CRR、戴维森BJ(1980年)《注意力与信号检测》。《实验心理学杂志:总论》109:160 - 174]的时间模拟任务,以比较参与将注意力导向空间位置与时间间隔的神经系统。我们探讨了是否存在一个独立于刺激维度分配注意力资源的通用系统,或者是否会招募功能专门化的脑区来将注意力导向环境的空间与时间方面。我们使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量了7名健康志愿者的脑活动,并使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量了8名健康志愿者的脑活动。该任务在析因设计中操纵对空间位置(S)和时间间隔(T)的提示性注意力。符号性中央提示仅将受试者的注意力导向S(左或右)、仅导向T(300毫秒或1500毫秒)、同时导向S和T,或不提供关于S或T的信息。在静息基线状态下也对受试者进行了扫描。行为数据显示,时间注意力期间的表现存在益处和代价,类似于空间注意力中已确定的情况。脑成像数据揭示了参与注意力任务空间与时间定向表现的神经系统之间存在部分重叠。此外,半球不对称性分别显示出空间和时间注意力时右侧和左侧顶叶的优先激活。同时关注两个维度时,双侧顶叶皮质被激活。这是对关注空间与时间线索的神经关联的首次直接比较。