Suppr超能文献

使用毛细管电泳对反应物料中的化学战剂降解产物进行定量分析。

Quantitative analysis of chemical warfare agent degradation products in reaction masses using capillary electrophoresis.

作者信息

Nassar A E, Lucas S V, Myler C A, Jones W R, Campisano M, Hoffland L D

机构信息

Battelle Memorial Institute, Bel Air, Maryland 21015, USA.

出版信息

Anal Chem. 1998 Sep 1;70(17):3598-604. doi: 10.1021/ac9713870.

Abstract

Quantitative methods have been developed for the analysis of chemical warfare agent degradation products in reaction masses using capillary electrophoresis (CE). This is the first report of a systematic validation of a CE-based method for the analysis of chemical warfare agent degradation products in agent neutralization matrixes (reaction masses). After neutralization with monoethanolamine/water, the nerve agent GB (isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate, Sarin) gives isopropyl methylphosphonic acid (IMPA) and O-isopropyl O'-(2-amino)ethyl methylphosphonate (GB-MEA adduct). The nerve agent GD (pinacolyl methylphosphonofluoridate, Soman), [pinacolyl = 2-(3,3-dimethyl)butyl] produces pinacolyl methylphosphonic acid (PMPA) and O-pinacolyl O'-(2-amino)ethyl methylphosphonate (GD-MEA adduct). The samples were prepared by dilution of the reaction masses with deionized water before analysis by CE/indirect UV detection or CE/conductivity detection. Migration time precision was less than 4.0% RSD for IMPA and 5.0 RSD for PMPA on a day-to-day basis. The detection limit for both IMPA and PMPA is 100 micrograms/L; the quantitation limit for both is 500 micrograms/L. For calibration standards, IMPA and PMPA gave a linear response (R2 = 0.9999) over the range 0.5-100 micrograms/mL. The interday precision RSDs were 1.9, 1.0, and 0.7% for IMPA at 7.5, 37.5 and 75.0 micrograms/mL, respectively. Corresponding values for PMPA (again, RSD) were 2.9, 1.1, and 1.0% at 7.5, 37.5 and 87.5 micrograms/mL, respectively, as before. Analysis accuracy was assessed by spiking actual neutralization samples with IMPA or PMPA. For IMPA, the seven spike levels used ranged from 20 to 220% of the IMPA background level, and the incremental change in the found IMPA level ranged from 86 to 99 % of the true spiking increment (R2 = 0.9987 for the linear regression). For PMPA, the five spike levels ranged from 10 to 150% of the matrix background level, and similarly, the accuracy obtained ranged from 95 to 97% of the true incremental value (R2 = 0.9999 for the linear regression).

摘要

已开发出定量方法,用于使用毛细管电泳(CE)分析反应物料中的化学战剂降解产物。这是关于基于CE的方法用于分析化学战剂中和基质(反应物料)中化学战剂降解产物的系统验证的首次报告。用单乙醇胺/水进行中和后,神经性毒剂GB(异丙基甲基膦酰氟,沙林)产生异丙基甲基膦酸(IMPA)和O-异丙基O'-(2-氨基)乙基甲基膦酸酯(GB-MEA加合物)。神经性毒剂GD(频那基甲基膦酰氟,梭曼),[频那基 = 2-(3,3-二甲基)丁基]产生频那基甲基膦酸(PMPA)和O-频那基O'-(2-氨基)乙基甲基膦酸酯(GD-MEA加合物)。在通过CE/间接紫外检测或CE/电导检测进行分析之前,通过用去离子水稀释反应物料来制备样品。IMPA的迁移时间精密度在日常分析中RSD小于4.0%,PMPA的迁移时间精密度RSD小于5.0%。IMPA和PMPA的检测限均为100微克/升;两者的定量限均为500微克/升。对于校准标准品,IMPA和PMPA在0.5 - 100微克/毫升范围内呈线性响应(R2 = 0.9999)。IMPA在7.5、37.5和75.0微克/毫升时的日间精密度RSD分别为1.9%、1.0%和0.7%。PMPA在7.5、37.5和87.5微克/毫升时的相应值(同样为RSD)分别为2.9%、1.1%和1.0%。通过向实际中和样品中添加IMPA或PMPA来评估分析准确度。对于IMPA,使用的七个加标水平范围为IMPA背景水平的20%至220%,所发现的IMPA水平的增量变化范围为真实加标增量的86%至99%(线性回归的R2 = 0.9987)。对于PMPA,五个加标水平范围为基质背景水平的10%至150%,同样,所获得的准确度范围为真实增量值的95%至97%(线性回归的R2 = 0.9999)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验