Oepen I
Institut für Rechtsmedizin der Universität Marburg.
Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Jul;60(7):420-30.
In the sphere of environmental medicine--analogous to other fields like oncology and chronic diseases--not only proven and approved methods, but also unconvential methods are offered, without evidence of efficacy. The application of these methods has the possible consequence of wrong diagnosis and malpractice. Examples are discussed such as Kirlian photography, electroacupuncture according to Voll, bioresonance diagnosis/therapy, kinesiology, regulation therapy according to Rost, "clinical ecology" according to Runow with, among others, the provocation/neutralisation test, a vaccination therapy with E. coli and finally electrosmog as an environmental noxa. Concerning the admissibility of contested methods, statements of medical specialist societies, judgements, and the law of medical products are quoted. In conclusion, the question of the origin of the ideas and alleged results of unconvential medicine is followed up and conclusions are drawn.
在环境医学领域——类似于肿瘤学和慢性病等其他领域——不仅提供经过验证和批准的方法,还提供未经证实疗效的非常规方法。应用这些方法可能会导致错误诊断和医疗事故。文中讨论了一些例子,如基里安摄影、福尔式电针疗法、生物共振诊断/治疗、肌动学、罗斯特调节疗法、鲁诺的“临床生态学”以及其中的激发/中和试验、大肠杆菌疫苗疗法,最后还有作为环境有害因素的电磁烟雾。关于有争议方法的可接受性,引用了医学专业协会的声明、判决以及医疗产品法。总之,对非常规医学理念和所谓结果的起源问题进行了追踪并得出结论。