• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[根据ICD - 10和DSM - IV标准诊断的急性精神分裂症综合征的精神病理学特征]

[Psychopathological profile of acute schizophrenic syndromes diagnosed according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria].

作者信息

Wciórka J, Anczewska M, Bembenek A, Gołebiewska M, Hochlewicz A, Nurowska K, Schaeffer E, Skowrońska J, Stanikowska I, Tarczyńska K

机构信息

I Kliniki Psychiatrycznej IPiN w Warszawie.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 1998 May-Jun;32(3):251-64.

PMID:9739178
Abstract

Diagnostic and symptomatological profiles of schizophrenic syndromes diagnosed according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV were compared. For this reason a group of patients fulfilling at least one of these sets of criteria was created and then diagnostic and symptomatological profile was compared between those who fulfilled the ICD-10 and those who fulfilled DSM-IV criteria. 105 inpatients hospitalized in acute phase of their first or one of consecutive episodes were included--102 of them had fulfilled ICD-10, and 90 DSM-IV criteria of schizophrenia. Diagnostic concordance between the two systems of criteria was high (83%). Differentiation of diagnostic profile (i.e. difference between frequency of fulfilling the specific requirements of ICD-10 or DSM-IV criteria) of the symptoms in these two groups was not significant, expert of 6-month criterion of duration of illness, which was significantly less frequently valid in ICD-10 syndromes group. A comparison of symptomatological profiles (i.e. frequency and intensity of symptoms) of schizophrenic syndromes diagnosed by ICD-10 or DSM-IV criteria and described by several rating scales (PANSS, SAPS/SANS, KOSS-S) did not show any significant differences. Results suggested that despite of different ways of defining the schizophrenic syndromes in both diagnostic systems, disorders manifested in the groups of patients created by means of them are very similar in psychopathological picture. This seems to be a significant change in comparison to more prominent differences contrasting the previous versions of the diagnostic systems (i.e. ICD-9 and DSM-III-R).

摘要

对根据国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM - IV)诊断的精神分裂症综合征的诊断和症状学特征进行了比较。为此,创建了一组至少符合其中一套标准的患者,然后比较了符合ICD - 10标准的患者和符合DSM - IV标准的患者之间的诊断和症状学特征。纳入了105名首次发作或连续发作之一急性期住院的患者——其中102名符合ICD - 10标准,90名符合精神分裂症的DSM - IV标准。两种标准系统之间的诊断一致性很高(83%)。这两组症状的诊断特征差异(即符合ICD - 10或DSM - IV标准特定要求的频率差异)不显著,但病程6个月标准在ICD - 10综合征组中显著较少有效。对根据ICD - 10或DSM - IV标准诊断并用几种评定量表(阳性和阴性症状量表、简明精神病评定量表/阴性症状评定量表、临床总体印象量表)描述的精神分裂症综合征的症状学特征(即症状的频率和强度)进行比较,未发现任何显著差异。结果表明,尽管两种诊断系统定义精神分裂症综合征的方式不同,但通过它们创建的患者组中表现出的疾病在精神病理学表现上非常相似。与先前版本的诊断系统(即ICD - 9和DSM - III - R)相比,这似乎是一个显著的变化,先前版本之间的差异更为突出。

相似文献

1
[Psychopathological profile of acute schizophrenic syndromes diagnosed according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria].[根据ICD - 10和DSM - IV标准诊断的急性精神分裂症综合征的精神病理学特征]
Psychiatr Pol. 1998 May-Jun;32(3):251-64.
2
[Clinical assessment of schizophrenic syndrome (CASS): validity evaluation of the new diagnostic tool].[精神分裂症综合征的临床评估(CASS):新诊断工具的效度评估]
Psychiatr Pol. 2000 Mar-Apr;34(2):203-21.
3
[Clinical assessment of schizophrenic syndromes (CASS): rationale, construction, reliability and sensitivity evaluation, and an attempt at normalization of the new diagnostic tool].[精神分裂症综合征的临床评估(CASS):新诊断工具的基本原理、构建、信度和敏感性评估以及标准化尝试]
Psychiatr Pol. 2000 Mar-Apr;34(2):179-201.
4
Schizophrenia in hospitalized adolescents: clinical diagnosis, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, and ICD-10 criteria.住院青少年精神分裂症:临床诊断、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版及国际疾病分类第十版标准
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1995;31(2):383-7.
5
The diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and unipolar depression: interrater reliability and congruence between DSM-IV and ICD-10.精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍、双相情感障碍及单相抑郁症的诊断:评定者间信度以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)与《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)之间的一致性
Psychopathology. 2009;42(5):293-8. doi: 10.1159/000228838. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
6
The validity of schizophrenia diagnosis in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: findings from a 10-year birth cohort sample.芬兰医院出院登记册中精神分裂症诊断的有效性:来自一个10年出生队列样本的研究结果。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(3):198-203. doi: 10.1080/08039480801983596.
7
Diagnostic criteria influence dementia prevalence.诊断标准会影响痴呆症的患病率。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;15(12):1034-45. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31813c6b6c.
8
[Schizophrenic disorders--does cognitive dysfunction relate to characteristics of course and psychopathology of the illness?].[精神分裂症——认知功能障碍与疾病的病程及精神病理学特征有关吗?]
Psychiatr Pol. 2006 Sep-Oct;40(5):867-84.
9
[Research in schizophrenia: necessity to include patients of multiple diagnostic systems].[精神分裂症研究:纳入多种诊断系统患者的必要性]
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1992 Apr-May;150(4-5):327-31.
10
[The revised definitions of schizophrenic disorders in ICD-10 and DSM-IV].[《国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)》与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM - IV)》中精神分裂症障碍的修订定义]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1998 Mar;66(3):133-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995248.

引用本文的文献

1
Competing definitions of schizophrenia: what can be learned from polydiagnostic studies?精神分裂症的相互竞争的定义:从多诊断研究中可以学到什么?
Schizophr Bull. 2007 Sep;33(5):1178-200. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl065. Epub 2006 Dec 8.