Wancata Johannes, Börjesson-Hanson Anne, Ostling Svante, Sjögren Karin, Skoog Ingmar
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry, Vienna, Austria.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;15(12):1034-45. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31813c6b6c.
The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of dementia using different diagnostic systems, and to investigate the influence of the different diagnostic components (memory impairment, personality changes, definition of other intellectual functions) on the prevalence.
A general population sample of 1,019 elderly living in Gothenburg, Sweden was investigated by using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale as well as specific assessments relevant for dementia diagnoses. Diagnoses were given according to the 9th and 10th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9, ICD-10) as well as the 3rd revised and 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R, DSM-IV). Further, "historical" criteria for dementia were applied as had been used in older studies.
DSM-IV dementia occurred most frequently (9.6%), followed by dementia according to "historical" criteria (7.4%), DSM-III-R (6.3%), ICD-10 (3.1%), and ICD-9 (1.2%). The kappa values for the agreement between the diagnostic systems were between 0.166 and 0.810. The requirement of both long-term and short-term memory impairment in DSM-III-R and personality changes in ICD-10 explained most of the differences. When these requirements were held constant, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, ICD-10 and "historical" criteria identified predominantly the same persons as demented (kappa: 0.810-1.000).
Prevalence of dementia varied widely depending on diagnostic classification system used. For DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, ICD-10, and "historical" criteria, the definitions of personality changes and combinations of memory impairment lead to differing prevalence rates, whereas the definitions of other intellectual functions have little impact.
本研究的目的是比较使用不同诊断系统时痴呆症的患病率,并调查不同诊断组成部分(记忆障碍、人格改变、其他智力功能的定义)对患病率的影响。
采用综合精神病理学评定量表以及与痴呆症诊断相关的特定评估方法,对居住在瑞典哥德堡的1019名老年人的一般人群样本进行了调查。根据《国际疾病分类》第9版和第10版(ICD - 9、ICD - 10)以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第3版修订版和第4版(DSM - III - R、DSM - IV)进行诊断。此外,还应用了早期研究中使用的痴呆症“历史”标准。
DSM - IV痴呆症最为常见(9.6%),其次是根据“历史”标准诊断的痴呆症(7.4%)、DSM - III - R(6.3%)、ICD - 10(3.1%)和ICD - 9(1.2%)。诊断系统之间一致性的kappa值在0.166至0.810之间。DSM - III - R中对长期和短期记忆障碍的要求以及ICD - 10中对人格改变的要求解释了大部分差异。当这些要求保持不变时,DSM - III - R、DSM - IV、ICD - 10和“历史”标准主要识别出相同的痴呆患者(kappa:0.810 - 1.000)。
痴呆症的患病率因所使用的诊断分类系统而异。对于DSM - III - R、DSM - IV、ICD - 10和“历史”标准,人格改变的定义以及记忆障碍的组合导致患病率不同,而其他智力功能的定义影响较小。