Aranda E, Díaz-Rubio E, Cervantes A, Antón-Torres A, Carrato A, Massutí T, Tabernero J M, Sastre J, Trés A, Aparicio J, López-Vega J M, Barneto I, García-Conde J
Hospital Clinico Provincial, Córdoba, Spain.
Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):727-31. doi: 10.1023/a:1008282824860.
The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given by bolus injection together with intravenous leucovorin (LV) versus high-dose 5-FU in continuous infusion (CI) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
A total of 306 patients were randomized to receive either 5-FU 425 mg/m2 given by bolus injection on days 1-5 plus intravenous (i.v.) LV 20 mg/m2 every four to five weeks or 5-FU 3.5 g/m2/week in a 48-hour CI. Therapy was continued until disease progression. Second-line chemotherapy was allowed in both arms.
The response rates in 306 patients with measurable lesions were 19.2% (modulated arm) and 30.3% (CI arm, P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival times were 23.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 25 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). Median survival times were 42.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 48 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). There were no significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicity profiles but if we consider all grades we observed more mucositis in the modulated arm and more hand-foot syndrome in the CI arm.
In terms of response rate, the continuous infusion regimen was more effective than the modulated regimen. There was no significant difference in survival and time to progression, and none in grade 3-4 toxicity.
这项多中心研究的目的是比较大剂量推注5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)联合静脉注射亚叶酸(LV)与高剂量5-FU持续输注(CI)治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效和毒性特征。
总共306例患者被随机分为两组,一组在第1 - 5天接受425mg/m²的5-FU推注,每四至五周静脉注射20mg/m²的LV;另一组接受48小时持续输注3.5g/m²/周的5-FU。治疗持续至疾病进展。两组均允许进行二线化疗。
306例有可测量病灶的患者中,反应率在调节剂量组为19.2%,在持续输注组为30.3%(P < 0.05)。无进展生存期的中位数在调节剂量组为23.5周,在持续输注组为25周(P = 无显著性差异)。总生存期的中位数在调节剂量组为42.5周,在持续输注组为48周(P = 无显著性差异)。3 - 4级毒性特征无显著差异,但如果考虑所有级别,我们观察到调节剂量组的黏膜炎更多,持续输注组的手足综合征更多。
就反应率而言,持续输注方案比调节剂量方案更有效。生存期和疾病进展时间无显著差异,3 - 4级毒性也无差异。