Marx M A, Frye R F, Matzke G R, Golper T A
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Sep;32(3):410-4. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9740156.
Concern about the increasing incidence of vancomycin-resistant organisms has tempered the enthusiasm for indiscriminate vancomycin use. Cefazolin has an antibacterial activity profile similar to vancomycin against most pathogens encountered in the hemodialysis (HD) population. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and serum concentrations that were achieved during empiric cefazolin use. Fifteen consecutive HD patients (five, conventional HD; five, high-efficiency HD; and five, high-flux HD) with suspected or documented infections warranting antibiotic intervention, including access-related, respiratory tract, urinary tract, or wound infections, were enrolled. Each patient received intravenous cefazolin (20 mg/kg actual body weight rounded to the nearest 500-mg increment [range, 1 to 2 g]) after each dialysis treatment for at least three doses. Cefazolin concentrations were obtained before and immediately after the next three consecutive dialysis treatments. Thirteen patients were evaluated for efficacy and all 15 were evaluated for toxicity and cefazolin blood concentrations. All patients showed at least a short-term (3-week) clinical resolution of infection with cefazolin treatment. No central nervous system toxicities were noted and no other adverse events were expressed by the patients during the course of cefazolin treatment. Predialysis cefazolin concentrations, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, were 70.2 +/- 42.7 (conventional HD), 45.6 +/- 18.9 (high-efficiency HD), and 41.6 +/- 23.9 mg/L (high-flux HD) over the three dialysis sessions. Cefazolin at doses of approximately 20 mg/kg administered post-HD appears to be a safe and effective empiric therapy and yields predialysis cefazolin concentrations of 2.5 times or greater than those considered to be the minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint (16 mg/L) for susceptible organisms. These data support the broader use of cefazolin for empiric treatment in the HD population, allowing vancomycin to be reserved for confirmed resistant organisms.
对万古霉素耐药菌发病率不断上升的担忧,使人们对不加区别使用万古霉素的热情有所降温。头孢唑林对血液透析(HD)人群中遇到的大多数病原体具有与万古霉素相似的抗菌活性谱。我们评估了经验性使用头孢唑林期间的临床疗效和血清浓度。连续纳入了15例HD患者(5例常规HD;5例高效HD;5例高通量HD),这些患者有疑似或确诊感染需要抗生素干预,包括与血管通路相关的、呼吸道、泌尿道或伤口感染。每位患者在每次透析治疗后接受静脉注射头孢唑林(20mg/kg实际体重,四舍五入至最接近的500mg增量[范围,1至2g]),至少注射三剂。在下一次连续三次透析治疗前和治疗后立即测定头孢唑林浓度。对13例患者进行了疗效评估,对所有15例患者进行了毒性和头孢唑林血药浓度评估。所有患者经头孢唑林治疗后至少在短期内(3周)感染得到临床缓解。在头孢唑林治疗过程中,未观察到中枢神经系统毒性,患者也未出现其他不良事件。通过高效液相色谱法测定,在三个透析疗程中,透析前头孢唑林浓度分别为70.2±42.7(常规HD)、45.6±18.9(高效HD)和41.6±23.9mg/L(高通量HD)。HD后给予约20mg/kg剂量的头孢唑林似乎是一种安全有效的经验性治疗方法,透析前头孢唑林浓度是敏感菌最低抑菌浓度断点(16mg/L)的2.5倍或更高。这些数据支持在HD人群中更广泛地使用头孢唑林进行经验性治疗,从而将万古霉素保留用于确诊的耐药菌感染。