Suppr超能文献

孕中期流产——一种筛查方案的评估

Mid-trimester loss--appraisal of a screening protocol.

作者信息

Drakeley A J, Quenby S, Farquharson R G

机构信息

Miscarriage Clinic, Liverpool Women's Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1998 Jul;13(7):1975-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1975.

Abstract

The main causes for mid-trimester loss are known. There is likely to be overlap with those of first trimester loss, but the proportions may be different. We wished to perform an aetiological survey in a large population of patients with a history of recurrent miscarriage, for possible explanations for their second trimester miscarriages. Database analysis of 636 patients attending a UK University Teaching Hospital dedicated miscarriage clinic between 1991 and 1996 revealed a 25% prevalence (n = 158) for second trimester miscarriage. Results from an investigative screening protocol were positive in 50% of cases: 33% (n = 52) tested positive for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS); 8% (n = 13) fulfilled strict criteria for cervical incompetence; there was a 4% prevalence of uterine anomaly; 3% for infection (n = 5) and 2% of patients (n = 3) proved to be hypothyroid. Importantly, dual pathology was found in 5% of patients with a history of second trimester miscarriage. As idiopathic mid-trimester loss is a diagnosis by exclusion, a high index of suspicion is required, as are modern diagnostic techniques.

摘要

孕中期流产的主要原因已为人所知。其原因可能与孕早期流产有重叠,但比例可能不同。我们希望对大量有复发性流产病史的患者进行病因调查,以寻找其孕中期流产的可能原因。对1991年至1996年间在英国一所大学教学医院专门设立的流产诊所就诊的636例患者进行数据库分析发现,孕中期流产的患病率为25%(n = 158)。调查性筛查方案的结果在50%的病例中呈阳性:33%(n = 52)抗磷脂综合征(APS)检测呈阳性;8%(n = 13)符合宫颈机能不全的严格标准;子宫异常的患病率为4%;感染率为3%(n = 5),2%的患者(n = 3)被证明患有甲状腺功能减退。重要的是,在有孕中期流产病史的患者中,5%发现有双重病理情况。由于特发性孕中期流产是一种排除性诊断,因此需要高度怀疑,现代诊断技术也同样如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验